That's actually a very good question...

Yes, to quite a few. Think of animal testing on cosmetics - there's not as much of that now, but that's partially *because* the testing already happened in the past. Some will never use these products because of their history, but economically they may not be *funding* animal testing by using quite a few products.

I guess it'll come down to the endgame for production methods. If it takes animal cells to produce meat, which ones and how are they retrieved? If animals still have to die for the meat to be created, cause-oriented vegetarians and vegans may be happy that not as *many* have to die, but still may decline. If the cells are just taken once, replicated, and then used without any other animals having to die, that would probably change more minds.

For me it wouldn't make a difference. I don't eat meat because I don't like its taste and not because for the ethic reasons. I tried meat thrice on my visit to China and vomited every single time. Never Again !

Translation: "Why was my report disagreed with?"

Growing meat in a lab is pretty high science and tech. It's an interesting story how that is being considered and the possibilities it raises.

Devil-X: It's sciency lol. We've always allowed science.