Not sure if you realise this, but no one cares that much about privacy.
It's an entirely new case, and her faking anything obviously hasn't been proven. Why would she need to fake threats when she gets hundreds of real ones anyway?
I have Z1 and I can typically go two days without recharging. If Z3 has an even better battery life, I want that thing to be transplanted into my chest when my heart stops beating. Just because.
But they're the best of both worlds! The open software and specs of a Samsung phone and the beautiful design of an Apple phone.
Next time you're going to the electronics store and the clerk hands you a piece of plastic with a Samsung logo on it, or an overpriced fruit-branded metal case, smack that guy in the face and say "No, sir. I would like a top of the line product for twice the fun and a lesser price." He'll call the police -- and give you a Sony p...
It's not bad, but for me it's certainly not as good as just having the conversations in the actual Facebook app. It was a little laggy on my old phone and even on my new phone, the chat bubbles get in the way when I'm doing other things. Just getting notifications was absolutely ideal.
It's basically the same as opening the facebook app, but it's an overlay, so it doesn't look that way.
Russia is all the rage these days. Somewhat literally.
So... N4G stories can be behind paywalls now?
I mean, no wonder he publishes his password. He's protected by a paywall, anyway.
It's obviously not average to do great. If it were, odds would be adjusted thereafter. You'd get quite a decent check from getting all those games right.
I'd imagine no numbers would have predicted Costa Rica beating anyone, but Hellas, for instance. Or Chile - Spain, or USA - Portugal, Ghana - Germany, and so on.
So why is she right every time? Well, there are literally millions of people trying to predict the world cup. Some of them are bound to...
I believe Settler and windblowsagain are actually fake conspiracy theorists. No one believes that we didn't actually land on the moon. That's just not realistic. I mean, look at the evidence:
If they're able to write comments on the Internet, why aren't they able to read a 400 word debunking article?
And how can they think the moon landing is unrealistic, when they are likely typing on a machine far, far more advanced than anything on the moo...
Whiten your teeth. Takes like an hour at the dentist, or some minutes a day for a week at home. It's fun, it's free* and best of all, it's something you can do with your whole family.
*charges may apply
Is he really THAT rich?
I did not know.
Good thing there aren't any poor people, and that this therefore is morally right.
There are plenty of creationists who think that God created the universe, the heavens and earth in seven days (or six days + day off), so while I believe you when you say you haven't met any (I haven't either), there certainly are people out there who do.
Also, don't be fooled by the term "Young-earth creationism". It's actually typically defined as someone who believes the universe and earth was created in as short period of time, and not just the e...
Along with this story, N4G and its sister sites (techspy included), are nothing if not proof that people don't actually read or take time to consider articles.
None of those two messages were replies to what I said...
How is price a tie? Isn't PS4 less expensive?
Also, Xbox One comes with a Kinect - kind of the deal with that console. They're gonna start a standalone bundle though, but still.
@dc1
First of all, you start with the premise of there being morality, and say that we know it does exist.
Well, we know people and animals experience impulses of "good" and "bad", but even though some acts are condemned as wrong in every culture on earth, it may very well be that there's simply a strong consensus on which acts are to be considered right or wrong.
An objective standard for right and wrong is not required for u...
Really hopeless comparison. Just because something seems unintuitive doesn't make it not true. The practice of reading samples of cosmic background radiation (which is everywhere in the Universe) is quite different from finding a plane that could be anywhere within an area the size of Australia.
Having said that, it is quite extraordinary that the plane could "vanish" like that.
To be honest, I think you completely missed the point of the comment you're replying to. Racer-X commented on the age of the Universe, and contrasted the idea some do hold of a young universe to the sophisticated understanding we have of the actual circumstances surrounding the birth of the Universe, as presented in the article.
For the record, all "famous atheists" (that I can think of, anyway), embrace the scientific explanation of the origins of the Universe...
As an American, I believe it's my constitutional right to own a laser or a rail gun. In fact, here's hoping the government will fund a "everyone gets a railgun"-bill, so that I can protect me and my family from any battle ships breaking into our house.
Interesting. Do that with a complete stranger and see if you get the same result. For science.