Well said legion, Im really tired of these ignorant fools that also cant seem to remember that maybe some people cant afford all the fnacy crap or just overall find it simpler to use a USB or maybe they live in some country where only USB is available.

This looks cool,but also very harmful to health.
SE makes really shitty stuff. I dont trust them.

Really are you trying to present yourself as a techwizard? The presentation showed the transfer of a picture taken with a mobile phone to your home screen or pc, I really doubt anyone would use a USB nowadays to do that. It's not like bluetooth or any other wireless option costs more than a USB cable, so the comparison between the DVD and blu ray situation doesn't make any sense.

Techwizard? Far from it. TechGeek??? Guilty as charged. I have always been one of the first to have to get the latest technology regardless of if I had even opened the box of the previous item I had bought.

My comment had nothing to do with the article it had to directly with your statement of "...who still uses USB except for charging." which appeared to be a statement instead of a question due to a lack of a question mark. Seeming to present the case that you knew something more about the current market then the rest of us and have some how deemed all the devices current and forth coming that have USB are some how archaic due to not meeting up with the wireless world that so many people are pushing.

Being very familiar with wireless devices and security myself I can say that direct transfer will for me always bare more weight in my corner due to transfer speed and security then the wireless mode.

As for the DVD, Bluray reference. It was suitable analogical reasoning in this day and age. With the identification of one being thought superior then the other in function and yet not having a strong enough foot hold to take over the market. It was in no way a direct comparison and most people I am sure could see the difference?