Earlier today, the Department of Justice filed its latest response to Apple regarding the encryption case centered around the San Bernardino iPhone. In the filing, the FBI said that its request “invade no one’s privacy” and accused Apple of being “corrosive and false” in its rhetoric. Now, Apple general counsel Bruce Sewell has replied to the filing with some choice words…
Vision Pro is here and it’s a surprisingly capable device. Apple has also loaded the headset with a ton of options and features that aren’t obvious at first glance.
Ringing the changes: All the news, rumors, and tips you missed last week.
Apple is anticipated to announce the new OLED iPad Pro this spring. Although there has been considerable speculation about the product, it’s always reassuring when Apple officially confirms certain features through upcoming software updates.
I've fixed the images on some of these past submissions of yours. Please in the future make sure the image isn't broken on submission.( I always found it best to download/upload it to be honest. )
Things escalate, Apple surely enjoys the public support they get.
"Or the ridiculous section on China where an AUSA, an officer of the court, uses unidentified Internet sources to raise the spectre that Apple has a different and sinister relationship with China. Of course that is not true, and the speculation is based on no substance at all.
To do this in a brief before a magistrate judge just shows the desperation that the Department of Justice now feels. We would never respond in kind, but imagine Apple asking a court if the FBI could be trusted "because there is this real question about whether J. Edgar Hoover ordered the assassination of Kennedy - see ConspiracyTheory.com as our supporting evidence."
Wow. I am surprised he went there. He has some guts.
Apple is getting pissed with FBI.
Honestly, I am really concerned this will set a precedent where anyone can ignore a government court order...
Face the facts apple:
1. The phone was owned by the state government who
2. Gave permission to have the phone searched by:
3. A judge who ordered a search warrant to legally and lawfully search the phone of:
4. Someone who is dead and thus no longer has any expectation of privacy!!
Apple is more concerned about impressing their stock holders/millenial bandwagon than prosecuting terrorists that killed innocent people.
Apple...give it up already, you're not that cool anymore!
The sooner Obama and his ilk go the better honestly.