The announcement for PlayStation 5 is expected to be in 2019 followed by a release in 2020 and we have got some new teasers about its graphic capabilities
What?! How high are you?
Won’t happen. Maybe if you’re playing Tetris Effect but even then they won’t go through the trouble of having such a high bandwidth port. PS5 is gonna be 4k and we can only hope 60 frames, but likely the games will settle at 30 frames.
Why would you think that? The X can do 4k 30 and 60 in a few games with the main bottleneck being the CPU. Once the consoles jump to a better CPU, 60fps is most likely the target all games will easily hit. The whole 120 or 240 fps rumours going around will be playing games in 1080p modes for those with monitors over TVs
Eh, I think we're going to see way more 60fps games.
We're at a point where 1440p-1800p60+Checkerboarding looks better than 4K30
Most games have a performance mode on the Pro targeting 60fps.
If we can get around 10-12 TFLOPS that means they'll be able to double framerate and still have room to spare for better graphics/effects. However this might require a $500 console or for Sony to take losses(which they are projecting over the next few years, meaning PS5 is likely on the horizon now and and will be a loss leader).
Look at Kingdom Hearts III, Resident Evil 2, God of War, and Shadow of the Colossus for example. All have 60fps modes already. FPS games already have 60fps. Platinum Games already has 60fps. Flagship racers have 60fps. Many anime games have 60fps and their quality is getting better as well. Fighters have 60, and so on. This means for sequels they can just increase the resolution and graphics and we'll have the 60fps as well.
A huge standout title will be Final Fantasy VII Remake. Since KH3 has 60fps on the Pro, it's hard to believe FFVIIR won't have it on the PS5. And 1800p60 has very similar costs to 4K30, however, it looks nearly identical, if not having better detail as well, and gives you the 60fps goodness.
Also, Ryzen is going to make the tradeoff between res and fps much more manageable with less of a hit when making the jump to 60.
It's really hard to believe people downvote over objectivity.
The games listed ALL target 60fps. Whether or NOT you want to believe it.
1800p60 has similar costs to 4K30 but looks nearly identical. Pixel density is extremely high now.
Ryzen will help with fps immensely.
I guess it's hard being confronted with data when you're stuck in your own flawed logic and want to ignore reality. Cognitive dissonance at it's finest- but what's annoying is you're all gamers, you all should know this.
Good god these sites are cancer.
No next gen machine will be able to do this.
Yeah maybe pong LUL
Bullsh!t. It wont even run 4k@60fps
4k 60fps is believable on well optimised first party games and less intensive multi-platform games.
We just have to accept that no matter how powerful it is, some devs will always push the graphics and settle for 30fps so their game looks better compared to the competition.
Yeah but are they really pushing graphics or just resolution?
1800p60 looks nearly identical to 4K30 and has similar costs but runs at 60fps.
We're at a point where pixel density is so high it makes sense to use checkerboarding w/60.
4K30 isn't pushing graphics, it's pushing numbers. 1800p60+CB. That's pushing graphics.
The only thing it would be able to run 120fps @8k at would be video, and even THAT I'm immediately skeptical of. There is no setup a consumer could buy that would handle that for video games, unless you were playing something from the 90's/early 2000's lol.
I wont be happy unless it's 64k at 240fps.
Lol you mean the PS6?
More like the PS6. The RTX 2080Ti can only run 4K ultra 60 fps and that's a 1k-1400 card. They can't put that into a £500 console. There will be no card in the PS5 even close to that, remember also that they use AMD video cards too which perform far worse than Nvidia.
The PS5 will be a true 60fps 4K as opposed to 4K 30fps on the X on AAA titles.
They don't need to be $500 consoles....Not everything needs to be welfare priced for the EBT shopper.....Its time some people start learning that gaming is a WANT in life a hobby, not a NEED in life that you need to survive....If someone can't afford something then they don't get that something until they budget or save for it....Im tired of things needing to include poor people
I highly doubt that. I don’t even think high end gaming PCs can do it.
That's a big jump way too fast for Sony and PS5 I think.
4K hasn't even really settled yet for most.
Here we go. Starting rumors so when the PS5 does come out and doesn't do what the rumors suggest, people can be like. "hahaha Where's the 8K and 120fps? Stupid Sony, lying to us again."
Haha what mad dreams men dream haha
"Latest Teaser Suggests"
Seriously insanely naive if you think this has a remote chance in hell of happening for the PS5. All this excitement started because of some GTS prerendered video (not actual gameplay) at a tech expo that was created to show off Sony's 8k TV technology (for their Cledis tech that is still not released). Well, I suppose if you could afford that future 8K TV (32ft x 16ft wall of 8k TV) you could afford the souped-up PC and small render farm that created the video.
Games scale. Thinking GTS talk of scaling is special and unique. Think again. ProjectCars (in late 2015) had an actual live (not prerendered) demo of the game running at 12K. It took over $8,000 dollars in PC hardware to do it (and that didn't even include the 3 4k monitors ). So having the capability to scale is not the overall issue. Most good game engines can scale a game if you designed it right and provide the assets. Having the hardware that can actually do it and at a price that average person could afford, is. And any next-gen console (PS or Xbox) will not even be in the same hemisphere as the hardware that will be needed to get any game to play 8k/120fps.
techquilla. new year's eve. what else you need to now
LOL, considering right this moment it would take at least a $5-6000 PC to do it and they are expecting a 2020 launch window, i seriously doubt it. Furthermore, 4k hasn't even reached the tipping threshold of market share yet and no consumer grade tv I can think of would support 120fps at 4k, let alone at 8k (currently a 32" 8k monitor goes for just under $4000, so add that to the machine price) so even if they did do that, not only would the console be completely cost prohibitive, but it would be for a reason that pretty much no one would even be able to take advantage of.
So 4K and 60fps then? Last gen they were saying 4K 60 FPS and we got 1080p. Mid gen machines got us closer, but rarely 60 FPS.
The WiiU also had a teaser for a new Zelda that didn't look like total shit. It never released and we got a game that barely runs and needs a specific art style to hide how weak the system is. You really think we're getting 8k anytime soon when 3 RTX 2080's can't even do that today? Moore's law has been dead forever you know.
I will be surprised to see ps5 hit native 4K 60fps on every title very doubtful. As for 8K 120fps even more doubtful. All speculation and rumours as usual, it’s a case of wait and see.
TechSpy is a community of awesome people posting and discussing the latest tech news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.