410°

Utah driver sues Tesla after crashing in Autopilot mode

A Utah driver who slammed her Tesla into a stopped firetruck at a red light earlier this year while using the vehicle's semi-autonomous function has sued the company, saying salespeople told her the car would stop on its own in Autopilot mode if something was in its path.

Cobra9512058d ago

Good! Let's see more of these. A competent auto-braking system alone would have done that job, let alone a competent autonomous vehicle.

". . . the Tesla automatically sped up to its preset speed of 60 mph (97 kph) without noticing the stopped cars ahead."

Yeah . . . no. Even if I had the money, I would not invest in deathtraps.

ProjectVulcan2058d ago (Edited 2058d ago )

You can hate Tesla all you like. But they have stuck their neck out an awful lot over the years to try and make a difference and advance technology in this industry, while the old stuffy big players have remained stagnant. Knowingly exposing themselves to potential criticism as they do is something most scaredy corporations run away from, and you have to respect Tesla for that even if they have major failings elsewhere.

This is still really prototype and experimental technology. It has more clear warnings than you can shake a stick at. It is not yet a legal replacement for a human driver controlling the vehicle. It does not yet absolve the driver of the vehicle from FULL responsibility of their vehicle and driving behaviour. This is made so clear when you enable the software!

This woman ignored all those cautions, took her eyes off the road completely using a phone. She did not touch the steering wheel for over a minute prior to the accident. All against the law, all against the warnings. She broke the laws of the road. She is responsible.

When people use it, then crash and then sue those people are frankly absolute morons. They damage the reputation of the technology. They slow it's introduction. They slow development and advancement that will in the end benefit everyone, without doubt.

Morons should not be allowed to litigate.

princejb1342058d ago

yup which is why this women is going to lose. Tesla has said the auto driving is still in beta and you should not look away from the road and be ready to take full control at any moment

Cobra9512056d ago

How do you figure Tesla is not liable here? An autobraking system alone would have prevented this accident, or at least reduced it to a minor one. If you read the story, you'll see that the vehicle was autonomously accelerating when it hit a freaking huge red obstacle. Allowing such dangerously defective design into a consumer's hands for use on the public roads is at the very least pure negligence. This is a civil case. If the plaintiff has any credible evidence that the car accelerated on its own into the back of a fire truck, the only way she loses is if her attorney is the moron.

x_xavier_x2058d ago

"Car data showed Lommatzsch did not touch the steering wheel for 80 seconds before the crash, "

Full autonomy is not part of the current Tesla autopilot program. Her claim that she was told otherwise is likely false. Tesla dealers are instructed to dissuade people from relying on autopilot, not persuade them to drive blind. She clearly violated the rules and suffered an unfortunate consequence. She will lose her case, but she should consider herself lucky to be alive. In most vehicles a 60 mph crash into a firetruck would result in instant death.

Kostche2058d ago

exactly, they keep passsing the buck to the human driver, when its a serious AI issue, either its a auto driven car that does not need human interaction or just leave cars the way they are driven by HUMANS, this cross driving experience is JOKE, its funny to see people defending this AI garbage, with its the womans fault, NO its the companies fault and the AI's fault for not being properly tested long term, instead as normal, they forgo all the risk to push it along fast, just like they did with mobile phones and wirelss signals and damge these cause to people and the enviroment

KingPin2058d ago

you do know airplanes come with autopilot right......do you see your captain walking around the plane while in-flight socializing with the passengers? blaming the AI that fails when the plane crashes.. they are there to keep an eye to make sure all the systems are working as they should by making changes only when necessary. similarly, auto-pilot in vehicles today is pretty much the same principle......but people like you and cobra misunderstand the term "auto-pilot" to mean "self-driving". two very different things.

Cobra9512056d ago

I've had people heavily disagree with me on the boards before. This is, after all, the internet. You could say "the grass is green" and you'll get angry replies. But this is such a clear case of technology that is not ready for prime time getting into the hands of average consumers, who suffer the consequences, that the overwhelming denial here makes me wonder what the deal is. Are technophiles so enamored of the promise of robot vehicles assuming control of the roads that they refuse to look past the end of their Google Glass?

windblowsagain2058d ago

That muppet Musk is a puppet.

About to get sued for calling people pedo's.

Faking tesla's in space. rofl.

Driverless vehicles are not needed.

MoonConquistador2057d ago

That's not wind you're blowing, it's hot air. You're pointless comment wasn't needed but alas, you decided to provide it anyway.

It's actually idiotic drivers behind the wheel of machines that can cause harm to others that are not needed (like the woman in this article as a good example)

usncahill2057d ago (Edited 2057d ago )

AutoPilot is a Level 2 autonomy, driver assistance feature. Any person purchasing a Tesla knows that the car cannot drive itself; it can maintain position in lane and relative to other cars in optimum conditions. Haters know this to but pretend that the system should be something greater than it actually is.

I drive with AutoPilot on every time I am on the highway in my Model S; it's automatic in my head. But I never expect the car to drive itself without my guidance.

SunnyZ2055d ago

"the final police report said she told police she was looking at her phone before the crash."
And she just threw out her case.
You should not be operating a phone while driving.
Never trust anything sold to you by a car salesman...

60°

There's finally a new 8K monitor on the way, with DisplayPort 2.1 included

The ASUS ProArt Display PA32KCX is on the way - a brand-new 8K monitor designed for professionals, including DisplayPort 2.1 connectivity.

60°

LG quietly fixes vulnerability in thousands of their TVs which could give access to hackers

Owners of LG TVs may want to learn about this vulnerability which could give hackers access to your device. Luckily, LG has rolled out a fix.

80°

Galaxy S25 to Integrate Advanced Google AI Features

Samsung's Galaxy S25 is set to elevate Google AI integration, extending to hardware depths.

Read Full Story >>
techacrobat.com
4d ago