SR
One of the more common critiques of Solo: A Star Wars Story is that it isn't a narrative that "needed" to be told, but the same can be said about every installment in the famed franchise. When Lucasfilm first officially confirmed Solo back in the summer of 2015, it was the new Star Wars film met with the most trepidation. Despite the prequel trilogy's improved reputation in the past two decades, the fan base still has a shaky history with origin stories of beloved characters, and this one had the added wrinkle of recasting Harrison Ford as the iconic smuggler.
When a messiah is needed, does it matter how a planet gets one? That's what we'll discuss in our Dune Part Two Review!
On the big screen, numerous Dark Knights flaunted their abs and flexed their muscles for the audience; however, Christian Bale's Batman physique remains the greatest.
Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes is the latest of the rebooted Planet of the Apes series and is a solid movie despite not being on par with the previous movies.
It was too predictable with some ok to nice moments.
Solo isn't necessary...should have ended it there.
What a bullshit premise.. none of the other Star Wars were necessary? They are the actual main arc that Lucas himself planned nine films originally. While I'm not bashing Solo, it is just a side spinoff about one character. It isn't a prequel or sequel to anything. Stupid logic.
lmao what a faux apologetic headline