540°

Final Fantasy VII Remake: Why Did Square Ditch Xbox?

IGN: “As we break in our brand-new studio, our Xbox crew discusses why Square seems to have had a change of plans with regard to an Xbox release of Final Fantasy VII Remake. Plus: the director of Halo Reach has a new first-person shooter, The Division 2's director contemplates a single-player spinoff, Gears 5 says no to smoking, and more!”

blacktiger1741d ago

Sony will never allow that happen even though they don't own it

InflectionPoint1741d ago

Final Fantasy 15 and Kingdom Hearts 3. It did happen.

djplonker1741d ago

@inflectionpoint

Final fantasy 14 and kingdom hearts 1.5/2.5/2.8 are on ps4 but not xbox

Doesn't prove anything either way.

SamPao1741d ago (Edited 1741d ago )

ff14 isn't because they did not allow crossplay (ms)

djplonker1741d ago (Edited 1741d ago )

The latest expansion just came out 2 weeks ago and its subs are growing.

Microsoft are really into cross platform play now too so I don't see why it isn't on xbox unless square thought it wouldn't do so well.

Magic_Spatula1741d ago

@SamPao The reason why 14 was never on Xbox was because at the time of negotiation with Microsoft, Microsoft didn't support crossplay and that the game on Xbox would require their own servers. Yoshida didn't want that as he wanted everyone on any platform to be able to play together. Apparently Microsoft hasn't changed that policy so until it changes, the game will never come to the Xbox.

bouzebbal1741d ago

What I wanted to say.. These two sold so poorly..

neutralgamer19921741d ago

It will be down the road but won't be soon

Godmars2901741d ago

It didn't happen well enough is the point.

When Square went near exclusive with the 360, put a flood of games on that system instead of the PS3, none of them sold well. That Square half @$$ed those games is besides the point. Meanwhile what was on the PS3 as well sold better.

DarkZane1741d ago

Those were announced before everyone realized Xbox wasn't relevant anymore. Notice how most of AAA games from Japan that SE has released didn't come to Xbox One?

blacktiger1741d ago

we are talking final fantasy 7

shauzy1740d ago

they both happened like last minute or the info got leaked that it'll be on xbox, idk i think ff7 will be on xbox just not announced yet

Juusterey1737d ago

@shauzy
Are you saying FF 15 and kh3 were announced last minute?
cos they were both announced as multiplatform years before they came out

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1737d ago
DillyDilly1741d ago

Its likely exclusive until it completes which will take years given its multi episodes

Pickledpepper1741d ago

I gave you an up vote just because dillydilly lol

1741d ago
Eonjay1741d ago

Square is making easy money. Its a known fact that their games sell better on PS4 so their was nothing to lose by taking whatever Sony gave them. Will it be on Xbox one day? There is a good chance, but there is no reason to believe that they are in a hurry or that it is any time soon.

Segata1741d ago

People said the same about the original.

Eonjay1741d ago

For 2 decades yes. So lets check back in 2040 so you can be vindicated.

Segata1741d ago

Eonjay

This isn't exclusive. How hard is it to comprehend on stage Sony said "play it first on PS4" that's a 1-year deal. It's not exclusive. I have a PS4 but I don't like FF7 anyway but people need to stop pretending this is exclusive when neither has said that.

milohighclub1741d ago (Edited 1741d ago )

@segata

Since when did "play it first on ps4" mean it's coming to xbox?

It could mean its coming to ps5, pc, switch, mobile...

Nu1741d ago

We need a Chrono Trigger Remake next

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1737d ago
Pedantic911741d ago

They didn't. Technically.

It's very obviously a timed exclusive for PS and to be released later for other systems.

The original only stayed exclusive for around a year and couple of months until the PC version hit the stores.

Elda1741d ago (Edited 1741d ago )

It stayed exclusive to Sony's PS gaming platform & consoles for 22 years before going on another company's gaming console. PC run games to play but it's not a gaming console.

343_Guilty_Spark1741d ago

Ff7 was exclusive for less than a year because the international version launched in 1997. I remember because I tried to run it on my 486, and couldn't.

2pacalypsenow1741d ago

FF7 came out in Jan 31st 1997 on PS1 and on June 25th 1998 on PC

LegoIsAwesome1741d ago

One year later: "Final Fantasy VII Remake: Why did it release on XboxOne, PC, Switch"

Asuka1741d ago (Edited 1741d ago )

Also One year later: "why Nintendo Switch is the best way to play Final Fantasy 7 remake"

What is really funny is that I'm not even being sarcastic smh...

LegoIsAwesome1741d ago

@Asuka Hahahahha yeahh.

"Why Nintendo Switch is the best way to play all games"

I own a Switch and I love it but those articles always made me laugh.

jaycptza1741d ago

on Switch it would like shite and run like shite too

InflectionPoint1741d ago (Edited 1741d ago )

Haha you guys are funny. Have you ever noticed how every new game on the switch is a cartoon. Any realism in lighting or character design quickly destroys the consoles hardware. Witcher looks like shit on Switch. So youre saying that a NEW game (not released 5 years ago) that has realistic lighting is gonna run at 30fps. You clearly dont understand how hardware works.

gamer78041740d ago

when all of the installments are out they'll be on more systems for sure.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1740d ago
Rynxie1741d ago ShowReplies(8)
SyntheticForm1741d ago

My feeling is that it will come to Xbox eventually.

Rynxie1741d ago ShowReplies(6)
gamer78041741d ago

no where did they every say it was ps exclusive, its going to be a timed exclusive, better get used to waiting on this game anyways since its coming out in installments. I'll maybe wait until there is a collection of them all together with all the stuff rather than paying 60$ for each installment.

bluefox7551741d ago

Even if it does, it won't really matter. The primary audience is on Playstation, and if you're a big fan of the original, I doubt you're gonna wait around for years until the episodes are finished and it may or may not eventually come to Xbox. Even if it's not technically an exclusive, it might as well be at this point.

Kavorklestein1741d ago

Some people waited until this gen's re-releases to even play thru the original. Maybe some are willing to wait for the remake, who knows?

RedDevils1741d ago (Edited 1741d ago )

When everyone will be enjoying on their ps5/6 and xbox 1080 (whatever they gonna name it).

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1741d ago
TheEnigma3131741d ago (Edited 1741d ago )

Because it will sell better on PS and Sony probably off set the potential xbox buyers.

Magic_Spatula1741d ago

Final Fantasy has always sold better on the PlayStation.

1741d ago
Magic_Spatula1741d ago

@Gahl1k Pretty much. I doubt many people outside of Japan even knew what Final Fantasy was until 7.

RedDevils1741d ago

Xbox only owners need to understand that, no one buy JRPG on xbox so if you even interest in the genre you need to buy a PlayStation/PC or Switch to have full support for that genre.

Show all comments (105)
70°

The INDIE Live Expo 2024 event is to feature over 100 game titles

INDIE Live Expo, Japan’s premiere online digital showcase series , will debut never-before-seen games & content updates across more than 100 titles on May 25th.

140°

PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher

With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?

thorstein3d ago

No, and they already solved any need with the overlay that's coming.

Vits3d ago

Unless they are trying to kill their recently created PC business, I would advise against opening a dedicated PC store. It's an extremely hard endeavor, and people, in general, are very comfortable with Steam. Even Epic, with their billions of dollars invested, is still struggling to find a foothold, and they have Fortnite.

just_looken2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Money is one thing security is another but again millions have 0 knowledge past 2020.

Epic store for years struggled with a shopping cart/account theft/credit card theft

Rockstar launcher/store to this day over 5 years later still has horrific user interface security flaws lost account's and stolen CC

Then you got that activision need phone number oh we lost it launcher

The crown jewel is the ea launcher/store ea app 3 yrs old still has hundreds of threads were people lost games/accounts/game access or just straight up crashes.

Edit" Oh ubi launcher were you buy a game that may or may not be there again or work and the launcher 5yrs old still has no 4K support if you launch it on a 4k screen there is a high chance it will just crash.

ocelot072d ago

Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming.

It's just a known fact. The PC gaming community prefer Steam and Steam alone. They don't like different launchers. I personally don't mind them. But majority just stick with steam. Hence why EA and Ubisoft went back to on releasing on steam and why Microsoft release games on steam as people hated buying from the windows store.

The only other launchers that I imagine are doing ok is GOG due to being drm free and epic games due to the free games every week. Sony shouldn't release any sort of pc launcher n

Nitrowolf22d ago (Edited 2d ago )

It literally says in the OP that PC gamers don't like multiple launchers lol. It even mentions Steam being the go to for gamers

Tacoboto2d ago

Title: "PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher"

N4G: "Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming"

When you don't even read the headline...

ocelot072d ago

I read it and had a brain fart. As read the title then this "With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?"

So I hold my hands up on that mistake. Rest of my comment still stands.

Giblet_Head2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Steam and GOG are highly preferred because of the rich feature set. Ubisoft, Rockstar, EA, Epic etc have all set a precedent over the years for customers to instinctively expect individual publisher launchers to be so extremely half-assed that the majority simply don't want to bother dealing with what is almost an inevitable disappointment by comparison to Steam or GOG. Those publishers and their inaction or general disinterest to improve have effectively ruined any future adoption to be taken seriously.

Einhander19722d ago (Edited 2d ago )

This is just another ridiculous double standard article.

It's like how Microsoft can spend 20 years of making nothing but gaas and live service style games to sell microtransactions, dlc and subscriptions and get praise for doing it, but if Sony wants to make a single game like that every website under the sun is writing articles saying how Sony is anti-consumer or whatever.

derek2d ago

Yep, huge double standard look at the tortured reaction to the ps5pro, websites hyperventilating like Sony is forcing people to buy it.

just_looken2d ago

Wait my xbox from 2004 has avengers gaas on it? wow your so smart

m$ Gaas started with the other companies like sony

Gamepass yes they are deep into that but its still a huge money saver sense you do not own your games then get a service like that.

Now there pc xbox launcher that is trash for years now

Show all comments (15)
90°

German Computer Game Awards 2024 has just announced its winners

"The best games of the year and the creative teams behind them were in the spotlight at the grand award ceremony of the German Computer Game Award 2024." - German Computer Game Awards.

anast3d ago

BG3 has won everything possible. It's insane.

TGG_overlord2d ago

That's right, well, BG3 deserved it imo.

anast2d ago

It's definitely a game of the generation if not all time.

InUrFoxHole2d ago

Sure buddy... You're trying to tell me it has a deeper story than goat 🐐 simulator 4000?!?!?. I wanna give bg3 a shot but my brain is burnt out on long games