what was the particles ??

neutrinos

Yeah, the Neutrino's really interest me. The scientific possibilities if this is a proven science are endless.

" If you look at it from a business standpoint (which that's what it all is at the end of the day), it might not prove beneficial to continue seeking a cure if they know they can prevent it from ever happening again."

That's where you are wrong... a cure is worth much more money than a vaccine. Also, you'd be the company that "Found a cure for AIDS/HIV" which would probably fund the company until our extinction.

Yes, a cure is worth much more money than a vaccine probably. I wasn't saying it wasn't. But that's only if a vaccine doesn't exist. If a truly effective vaccine exists (one that truly prevents the disease with great certainty) then a cure becomes far less profitable if arriving after that.

The reason being that the "consumer base" for that cure becomes a very very small amount of people, since the vaccine will prevent future people from even getting the disease. And if you look at it from a business standpoint, that "limited customer base" begins to appear FAR less profitable when factoring in the billions of dollars it would take to continue on to find a cure as well.

Are you certain? Please provide evidence of how we would not have modern medicine without evolution? What sort of evolution are you refering to? Are you refering to molecules to man evolution or wolf to poodle evolution?

I am not saying you are wrong, I am just aware that evolution means so many different things to different groups of people these days.

To Creationists, molecules to man evolution is not supported by evidence while Science is while they do support wolkf to poodle evolution.

To Evolutionist, both kids are supported. However we have never seen the sort of molecules to man evolution nor do we know how life started in the first place, at least last time I checked. Molecules to man is dependant on life starting from that primordial soup and I doubt we will ever get a chance to observe that. Same goes for man being created by God in the past.

So, seems to be it is the sort of eveolution that we can observe today that is PART of the sort of science that enables modern science.

Again, so it seems.

@master

Evolution means different things to different people because they don't know the definition of evolution. There is in fact one true definition and laws governing evolution. I was lucky enough in college to take and entire semester course on evolution and I can tell you that Ghost is somewhat correct. Withough random mutation selecting for preferable traits, our minds would never have evolved thus preventing us from developing science (or rather understanding the world around us as natural laws exist with or without us.

Dude, he's trolling. Just look at his name. It's obvious...

He's trying to start a "religious vs science" flame war.

Nope. Such a complex disease. I don't think it will ever be curable. I hope I'm wrong.

Right the problem with cancer is that there may not be one single cure as every type of cancer is different for each person as well as different for each type of cell, tissue, or system in each person.

There isn't a cure-all process for cancer.

Scientists are very very close though. You and I probably wont die from cancer in our lives because of the great scientists today.