"Proof" Lol

The moron said that women have inferior brains for engineering. Please, explain to me where the proof is in that statement. He should have been fired a long time ago, not for sexism, racism, or anything else. Just for plain incompetence.

Why don't we stop speculating and relying on what others said. Here is what he said, in his own words:

"Differences in distributions of traits between men and women may in part explain why we don’t have 50% representation of women in tech and leadership. Discrimination to reach equal representation is unfair, divisive, and bad for business."

"On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. These differences aren’t just socially constructed because:

They’re universal across human cultures
They often have clear biological causes and links to prenatal testosterone
Biological males that were castrated at birth and raised as females often still identify and act like males
The underlying traits are highly heritable
They’re exactly what we would predict from an evolutionary psychology perspective"

" I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership. Many of these differences are small and there’s significant overlap between men and women, so you can’t say anything about an individual given these population level distributions."

OMG, and he doesn't stop there. He goes on and on and on and on...

He continues by saying on average women are more NEUROTIC.

But according to you, "There is no proof?" Just HIS manifesto that took google 0.60 seconds to find.

Proof is provided above and below. She should be offended. He called her neurotic. She clearly didn't read his manifesto. I'm not sure you did either.

https://gizmodo.com/exclusi...

And Donald Trump is an actual person who studied at Wharton. It doesn't make him competent to lead the country. Adversely, Clinton, went to Yale and Wellesley. It didn't make her competent to run the country either.

In the USA, a "conservative scientist" is an oxymoron. Just look at what the National Academy of Sciences is going through with "conservatives."

@thorstein The scientists I listed are not "conservative" scientists. Everything I listed is from a left leaning source, because I know people like you will dismiss it outright if it's not from someone that's not aligned with you ideologically. Not that it would matter if they weren't, because science and facts don't care what your ideology is. Though that seems to be the only thing that you are concerned with. Try to stick to the facts.

Not conservative? OMG, it says he is IN THE LAWSUIT https://www.dropbox.com/s/f...

Since you won't read links, I'll quote it for you: "discriminated against (i) due to their perceived conservative political views by Google in California at any time during the time period beginning four years prior to the filing of this Complaint through the date of trial in this action (“Political Class Period”);(ii) due to their male gender by Google in California at any time during the time period beginningone year prior to the filing of this Complaint through the date of trial in thisaction (“Gender Class Period”);and/or (iii) due to their Caucasian race by Google in California at any time during the time period beginning one year prior to the filing of this Complaint through the date of trial in this action (“Race Class Period”) (Political Class Period, Gender Class Period, and Race Class Period referred to collectively, as “Class Periods”).These violations also subject Google toclaimsfor violation ofCalifornia’s Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq"

And he isn't done. This total nutjob thinks there is a giant leftwing conspiracy in Silicon Valley to hunt down conservatives.

Not conservative!?!!!???!?!!!?!!!? !!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!

How's that for facts? The lawsuit continues and gets more and more egregious. I just quoted the beginning.

Science has been under fire from conservatives since before the Enlightenment. You are right about it not caring what your ideology is, but in the USA science has become political when POTUS states that the CDC cannot use the following sentences: "Based on scientific evidence, a fetus can be endangered when exposed to the Zika virus. Here is the evidence based study. Provides link."

So facts? I have provided plenty. Along with some derision. If you apologize for misrepresenting this fool and admit that you were wrong I will gladly apologize for any derision I aimed your way.