1. eyes can see way, WAY more than 24fps. That's simply the point at which video appear nice and fluid.

2. High framerates on YouTube would allow gameplay and trailers to be more representable of the product.

I would rather have high framerates and high bitrates long before this 4K rubbish. 1080p on YouTube isn't half as nice as a clean 720p video.

NTSC is 60fps (tho interlaced) and PAL is 50fps (again, interlaced).. All those sports events you see is shot at 60fps (e.g. NBA) or 50fps(a football match in Europe)

Kennytaur is correct, the eyes can see much more than 24.

And I agree with Kenny, a 60fps youtube clip would much better represent the game, all those hard work devs put in to make their games fluid would not go to waste.

Eyes can see more than 24 fps http://amo.net/NT/02-21-01F...

I recently purchased a camera and you can tell the drastic difference when recording in 30fps vs 60fps mode.

Really? Look at the date of the posted 4k vids. Earliest is from 2012.

It still means they had 4k as early as 2012.

Well 4K is pretty old in the sense that there have been 4K projectors for a while now but I think those vids were done as a special project, not for public upload.