All Channels

Speed-Racer

NetworkManager
CRank: 26Score: 1002970

What submissions do/don't perform well

I've always battled to figure out what type of content best fits TechSpy. The policy across NewsBoiler is that admins and mods should try their best not to step in and filter topics based on personal preferences, but here are some topics you should generally avoid.

- Science - Unless it's directly related to tech, generally science topics may not do well because you know, it's not tech. There may be some one-offs like planet discoveries, but I've seen a lot of science content that really shouldn't be here.

- Announcements that are not exactly related to tech itself - So let's say a company announces that they are going to have a press conference, there's a good chance no one is going to approve it if they have never heard of the company. There are exceptions like if Google, Microsoft or Apple announce a press conference because of how influential they are.

- Certain viral content - Let's say a dog jumps in the air and attacks a flying drone, that really doesn't fall under the category of tech. If a dog bit a top level banking executive, would it have made news on the Financial Times or Bloomberg?

- Certain how-to guides - How to guides should be relevant based on time. For instance, if I post a guide on how to tweak Windows 95, then the relevance to today's standards doesn't match up. Time and time I've seen Android battery savings post that rehash apps from 2012 (pretty evident from the screenshots), so you have to weigh in with how relevant your guys may be.

- Too much business, hacking, Comcast, etc. - I'm not putting a ban hammer on these types of topics since there is an Industry tag for that, but don't hold your breath for a quick approval since they tend to have a niche audience and generally do not do well in terms of getting approvals or viewership. While some may be directly tech related, some tend to get too politically related with very little tech to talk about.

Essentially we are running into similar issues like /r/technology over on Reddit where political and non-tech related issues are overrunning real tech stories such as gadget news, rumors, and what not.

This really isn't a guide about what is not allowed, but just a reminder that straying too far from tech can lead to poor performance.

ZoyosJD3173d ago

Good luck trying to separate tech and science. They are intrinsically intermingled by definition. (Though I understand what you're intending, it's still a struggle since I was brought into the "tech" world world from a wildly different perspective.)

Technology - The application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. (Oxford)

As for almost everything else, the site promotes big numbers, so that is what you are going to get.

If anyone feels the content I or someone else puts up isn't tech enough, have some balls and use the lame selection in the report drop down. Otherwise, not choosing is still a choice.

sonicwrecks3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

Thanks for the guide Speed-Racer
_____________________________

A Quick PSA!

Incidentally as a heads-up to everyone if you're submitting medical or science links be sure to doublecheck the ending to make sure it isn't repurposed 'from materials' or that it is republished from a partner publication which would be the correct sourcing.

I think all of us more regular posters have slipped up on that over the last month and I don't want to be the bad guy reporting on it(!) >_<

Stringerbell3171d ago

Good point. It happens with sites like science daily and pop sci - they write the layman article and its coming from some journal or press please. Personally I feel that the journal should be getting the credit link and not the main link but I think the protocol for this site is the other way around. I'm not sure...

sonicwrecks3171d ago

It seems to vary a little between Newsboiler sites, perhaps Speed can confirm correct protocol for us on TechSpy?

I would agree with you though that the journal should probably get the credit in that instance. But let's see what is said. From what I've seen Phys and Space are in the same cautionary bracket.

Speed-Racer3171d ago

If a journal has a layman version with full access to the summary of the article, then fine, but there are some journals which can be very technical and not easily digestible for most community members. If you're not in the field, there's a good chance it may not be the best sort of reading material, so feel free to revert to the next best link that covers it. That's one for you all to decide which fits best. If you do link to a partner website or w/e, include the journal as the credit.

ZoyosJD3171d ago

The main issue with phys and space articles is that the source of their information is commonly referenced from journals which are far too in depth for anyone outside a professional in the field to wade through, and it would be obscenely expensive to access all the entries (usually around $5 an article or $100+ per year per journal). Some are even restrictive on who can access them as well.

People here want the application of science (a.k.a. the tech), not 40 pages of equations or chemical formula at those prices (a.k.a. the science).

This is exactly what I meant about separating science and tech up above. I try to provide info for those interested, while not feeding them what they don't want and still get shot down for it.

Speed-Racer3171d ago (Edited 3171d ago )

And this correctly sums up what should be done when posting to TechSpy wrt journals. I think only a few specific communities on the net (e.g. Reddit's /r/science prefer direct submissions over articles citing journals.

70°

The Ultimate List Of Smartphones Under £500 For Tech Enthusiasts

Uncover the best budget-friendly smartphones under £500 for tech enthusiasts. Grab your ideal phone now at a great price!
Know More @ https://rb.gy/yg06ey
Contact us on +91 9408382596
Email us on [email protected]
Explore our website: https://www.bestforreview.c...

Read Full Story >>
bestforreview.com
60°

There's finally a new 8K monitor on the way, with DisplayPort 2.1 included

The ASUS ProArt Display PA32KCX is on the way - a brand-new 8K monitor designed for professionals, including DisplayPort 2.1 connectivity.

60°

LG quietly fixes vulnerability in thousands of their TVs which could give access to hackers

Owners of LG TVs may want to learn about this vulnerability which could give hackers access to your device. Luckily, LG has rolled out a fix.