1010°

Four years later, Xbox exec admits how Microsoft screwed up disc resale plan

Ars Technica: Compare and contrast with Mehdi's marketing push for the plan back in 2013.

Read Full Story >>
arstechnica.com
UltraNova2577d ago

Next: How long will it take MS to acknowledge that their weak game library hurt the xb1to the point of no return? Another 4 years?

freshslicepizza2577d ago

point of no return? hardly. they still have an estimated 27 million units sold and still have time to bring out new games that can help spark more sales. scorpio will also give them more longevity.

chrisx2577d ago

Ms are out of touch with the standard requirements of console gaming. The whole push for scorpion when the obvious thing to do is pump out games is just ms in a nutshell

freshslicepizza2577d ago

chrisx, after E3 then you can talk. If they show no new games then you will have a point but we all know whatever they announce they will conveniently not interest you. So stop acting like you are a potential customer.

chrisx2577d ago

That's what I heard last e3 and the 1 before that.Scale bound had my interest big time and got cancelled so yea.thumbs up on the defence force

girevik2576d ago

Microsoft is always just one E3 away from greatness...

Goldby2576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

@moldy

Whats your definition of new games? do unannounced games also fall into new games? do sequels to games we have already played count a new games even if they haven't officially ben announced.

MS is playign the only hand they have with Scorpio, trying to be THE PLACE to play 3RD PARTY MULTI PLATFORM GAMES.
Not 1st. Not Second, but 3rd party.

Nintendo focuses solely on the 1st party exclusives
Sony focuses on 1st and 3rd part exlcuiives with great 3rd part multi support
Ms is fopcusing on 4rd party.

and i dont blame them, when all they see if sales skyrocket for Halo, Forza and Gears, but not risks like Recore, Sunset and others that didn't sell as well as they had hope, didn't push consoles they way they hoped,. they are going to be focuing again just on the 3rd party support.

Congrats MS you turned the Xbox and Scorpio into a PC for the living room....

time to go play good exclusives on other consoles.

thekhurg2576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

27 million is fake news. They don't discuss sales anymore just bullets fired.

Hilarious that you tell someone to not act like a potential customer when you pretend to be a Sony customer all the time for your trolling.

Utalkin2me2576d ago

@moldybread

"chrisx, after E3 then you can talk. "

What about now? Doesn't do any good for people that own one or would buy one now.

BIGBOSS082576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

Where will all these new games come from? Microsoft can't create studios out of thin air. They have very little 1st party studios. Unless you think they will drop halo and gears and get their 2 major studios to make new ip? Or will they get 3rd party exclusives? Which would be suicide for the developer as the scorpio will have a very small userbase. I really am looking forward to their e3. This one will be make or break for them.

game4funz2576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

@chrisx

well they did pump out a few games since those 2 e3 you mention.
Qunatum break, gears4, recore, halo5, rare collection, 2 Forza games, and a gears1 remaster since the 2015 e3.
Theyre still supporting Killer Instinct since launch as well.
What playstation game is still supported like that?
They had also released Ori and the Blind forest around march before the 2015 e3 and the definitive edition a year later with more content.

@thekhurg
That is not the defintiion of fake news...fake news is making something "as news" when it isnt.
The 27million is an estimate. It isnt fake news. Fake news would be..."MS is doing BC does this mean they wont do current gen games???"...thats fake news.

BigWan782576d ago

@chrisx

i want scorpio and games...you talk as if people cant chew gum and walk at the same time...

Utalkin2me2576d ago

@game4funz

"well they did pump out a few games since those 2 e3 you mention.
Qunatum break, gears4, recore, halo5, rare collection, 2 Forza games, and a gears1 remaster since the 2015 e3."

You made his point exactly.

Why o why2576d ago Show
ABizzel12576d ago

I agree with both of you.

I think MS knows they need games, and they'll have them in full display at E3, the problem is it's a bit too late this generation and there's not a lot they can offer from a first party perspective to combat the wave of PS4 exclusives.

MS E3 will be:

1. Big AAA 1st / 3rd party game (10 minutes)
2. Reveal of Scorpio ("true 4K gaming" will constantly be used, specs reveal, price, etc...) (10 minutes)
3. A collection of 1st and 3rd party games running on Scorpio (30 minutes)
4. Indies and Games Montage (10 minutes)
5. Xbox partnerships, new services, etc... (10 minutes)
6. A few 3rd party "Console Exclusives" from PC (10 minutes)
7. Fallout VR, Minecraft VR, and other Oculus VR games (10 minutes)
8. Final big reveal, the Coalition new IP (Black Tusk old game) / Cyberpunk 2077 (5 minutes)

This has to be their E3, and while it's impressive overall, I don't think it's going to be enough to really help XBO against the PS4. That battle can only be remedied with a price drop to keep XBO sales strong and competitive. That being said it's definitely what the XBO needs a big focus on games.

From a 1st / 2nd party perspective they have: Forza 7, Crackdown, Sea of Thieves, Halo (6), Phantom Dust, State of Decay 2, and Gears DLC. Those games are good for current Xbox fans, but none of them are bringing in new gamers, and neither will Multiplat games.

What's going to help XBO will be the PC exclusives they can nag to be console exclusives on their platform and to a lesser extent VR with Oculus (VR is going to have a VERY slow adaptation on Xbox, because now they have to buy what is likely a new $500 console and a new $600 VR headset).

But bringing PC exclusives over to the console will give it more diversity that it desperately needs to separate itself from the PS4, and to build a better niche for itself this generation, until they can actually build their teams up enough to where they can go on a 2 game per team development cycle like Sony has done. The problem is we likely won't reap those benefits until the 4th Xbox launches considering it takes at least 2 - 3 years to create a new IP and by then we'll be in 2019 / 2020.

trooper_2576d ago

You guys said after last E3 and nothing happened.

freshslicepizza2576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

Abizzel1 gets it right, most of the rest of you don't care what Microsoft does at E3 and it will be obvious within the topics. The PC has such a diverse library so if they can bring a lot of that to consoles it will boost it's image.

Some will now say why don't I just build a comparable Windows PC. Great! But we all know those who say they are and those that do are polarizing and contradictory​. Sony sure hopes you don't, that's why they came out with the Pro. They know they cannot survive on just exclusives. This is why Nintendo constantly tries something different with the hardware to differentiate themselves because they don't have third party support like Microsoft and Sony do.

Scorpio will fill that area as well for the mainstream who don't want to get into PC gaming but want a more powerful console. When a game like Fallout 4 can sell over 7 million copies on the PS4 that tells me a lot. It tells me there is a significant market still for console gaming which the Scorpio will also fulfill. So no, the PC argument to counter why do I need Scorpio is just vaporware from those who are always looking for bullet points why nobody should support Xbox.

dkp232576d ago

27 million unit sales and hardly any of them are buying their exclusive games. They have all were mediocore or below in terms of sales and without sales on their ip, less investment is made on new ips

Miss_Weeboo2576d ago

What? we need to wait for the 10' exclusive content at E3?
Maybe next E3, you know. Maybe

Chevalier2576d ago

Unless MS are writing cheques I don't see why there will be a wave of content coming from PC to Scorpio. Those publishers would be better off porting it to release on PS4/Pro in addition to Xbox. Especially since Scorpio has ZERO units sold.

_-EDMIX-_2576d ago

MS brand has been damaged badly if it wasn't already messed up.

XB360 lost TONS of consumer trust in this company to make hardware, XONE rolls around and theses guys have some Pinky and The Brain plan to try to kill the used market.

Sooooooooooo yea.

Even if you like MS, you have to admit they can't really be a primary system because of those shady qualities. All companies have something they do messed up and clearly MS has that whole questionable trust issue. I don't care how much you like Gears or Halo or Forza, man...XB gamers where UP IN ARMS to let MS know that was not ok to try to remove used games for their scheme. It was just sad, embarrissing and didn't even serve a real use.

They never even explained WHY it had to be that way , they never really answered why not do both.

They wanted to take over the market......thats it.

We have many options that exist RIGHT NOW ,I see no benefit to the user to REMOVE a option. NO POSITIVE came from that remove bud, not for the consumer anyway.

Consider....if they want a digital system, sure......have those SKU's with the Bluray Disk that just install and need DRM LABELED...DRM, INSTALL ONLY.

THEN have a SKU that can be used like normal.

Why couldn't they do that? LMFAO! Did you guys really think they couldn't? Magic maybe? LOL! They didn't even leave it in as an OPTION! It goes to show you, they ONLY wanted it to take over the market, NOTHING MORE. In fact, I feel they got rid of it even as an option as it would show that consumers could have BOTH. It would mean they could NEVER come back and say "Well XONE you could either install the disk and take it out or install the disk and leave it in as its DRM, but now...........you can only install only 1 time and the disk is garbage, because of advancement in technology, less options is better for you.....yea"

They tried something so dark, I think even its MOST hardcore fans could not overlook. Trust me bud, if Sony or Nintendo did some crap like that, I'm putting them in their place. We are making Facebook groups, making petitions, posting like crazy etc lol That is what MS fans did too, they got that crap reversed as they are not sheep bud. They might like MS, but they like GAMING FIRST!

Unspoken2576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

How long does it take for Sony fanboys to realize the only reason Sony needs to pump out games is because Sony games are only good for one play through. The reason MS can use hrs played or players logged into their services instead of consoles sold is because of their continued support of Live, a player base that keeps coming back for more and more. Examine multiplayer content and you'll see why Xbox hasn't gone the way of Wii U.

You can also play as many 3rd party games as you want. And with Scorpio it will be the best place to play all 3rd party games. We'll see article after article of increased resolution and faster frame rates. If MS continues to push for new IPs and stay committed to the platform it will just grow, so no need to worry about it.

Critic4l_Strik32576d ago

@moldybread its always "wait until E3" with xbox fans and Microsoft right? Keep waiting then

Critic4l_Strik32576d ago

@game4funz

2 new IP releases (QB, Recore)
4 existing IP releases ( Halo 5, Gears 4, 2 Forzas, Rare collection, Gears 1 again)

2 brand new IPs in almost 2 years? That sure says a lot

UKmilitia2576d ago

how can scorpio do anything? they still need the games

Bathyj2576d ago

So your advise would be "Wait for E3"

But wait, you didnt say what year. Ive been waiting for E3 with Xbox since Kinect 1 was announced. Thats about the time the platform I loved turned to $h*t.

Anyway, Ha "Wait for E3". Id love for Phil to come out with a shirt with that written on it.

Mr-Writer2576d ago

@moldybread

"estimated 27 million"

Yes estimated not actual fact. You could argue its lower than that as MS have stopped reporting the actual sold to customers numbers.

Chano2576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

chrisx wym pump out games? The games that have been announced last e3 for xbox one and ps4 - xbox one's percentage of games released that were announced since e3 was higher lol. Also where were all these guys talking about "xbox no exclusives" back in 2015 when even sony admitted their 1st party line up was sparse? Everyone here suddenly forgot about that, so quick to attack xbox but when sony does it - "oh its ok i guess"

dmetripaulpavlin2576d ago

@chrisx

Ha so Scalebound had your interest? What exactly did that game have your interest for? Was it the cunt mouthed dev who based M$ aka the money for his shit project? Was it the extremely ordinary bullshit dragon game? Or was it the completely unnecessary faggotry of the game in general that really had you interested? That's why your opinion doesn't matter to any company, because unlike the rooms full of number crunching nerds who have years of experience you still think you know better than the companies that employ those people and decided to cancel the project.

Seafort2576d ago

Who the hell asked for 4k gaming? It's not even that common on the PC platform yet never mind the consoles. None of my friends on PC have 4k displays to run 4k games well. I certainly don't.

I feel the console manufacturers have skipped a step. How about they develop a console that can do 1080p/60 fps consistently before they even try to move to 4k?

4k gaming will not be mainstream for another few years but Sony and MS seem to want to push that agenda. I bet most console gamers don't even have 4k tvs so what's the point?

+ Show (28) more repliesLast reply 2576d ago
skydragoonityx2577d ago

Its too late to apologize... Its tooo laaaateee

threefootwang2576d ago

They spent way too much time explaining the rules and restrictions of the new system and not enough time explaining HOW the new system would benefit gamers.

IGiveHugs2NakedWomen2576d ago

Microsoft will never stop being Microsoft. They will try making money off of their fans by creating things that take little to no effort in order to maximize profits:

Elite Controller
Customer colors for controllers
Game Pass - subscription for games that only new owners will care about
Then they'll introduce Scorpio. Microsoft's version of Alienware and Xbox fans will eat it up.
The one thing missing from this picture:

FIRST PARTY SOFTWARE

AngelicIceDiamond2577d ago

The point of no return is definitely hyperbole, and yes is that's exaggerating every console has bleak moments, but always seem to bounce back sometime down the line. Nintendo has had many bleak moments or "the point of no return" as you say and released Breath OF The Wild and is the highest rated Zelda game ever and one of the highest rated games this year so far.

If MS really wants to get themselves out of this slump they will.

Gazondaily2576d ago

THIS right here folks!

Oh and the BEAST!

....I really should stop..

UltraNova2576d ago

I really hope, at least for your own good, that the fact that you used a competitors game to prove that MS "could turn things around if they wanted to" and couldnt find a single similar xbox/MS example is pathetic and testament to the bleak state of affairs at camp Xbox.

Even more pathetic is the fact that people were foolish enough to get on board with what you said. Oh well...c'est la vie.

oakshin2576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

You have a underdog complex I remember you from lensoftruth....I have no point btw lol

Gazondaily2576d ago

" that the fact that you used a competitors game to prove that MS "could turn things around if they wanted to" and couldnt find a single similar xbox/MS example is pathetic and testament to the bleak state of affairs at camp Xbox. "

"Even more pathetic is the fact that people were foolish enough to get on board with what you said. Oh well...c'est la vie."

Clearly you suffer from a lack of reading comprehension skills.

He just cited an example of a platform maker that is perceived to be doing even worse than the Xbox having the chance to turn things around. You saying that Xbox hasn't got an actual example of itself turning things around as some sort of weakness in his argument is idiotic. It doesn't need to have that but arguably you could say the 360 did that after the original Xbox's short lifespan?

So yeah learn to read and understand the point. Or not....and continue to get schooled 24/7

THE BEAST!

generic-user-name2576d ago

"and released Breath OF The Wild and is the highest rated Zelda game ever"

No it's not.

LexHazard792576d ago Show
UltraNova2576d ago Show
Why o why2576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

Lol my brother says 'THE BEAST'

I say 'with no TEETH '

2576d ago
Godmars2902576d ago

@AngelicIceDiamond:

What system has come back from "the point of no return"? The PSP, the Atari Lynx, the Deamcast? It could be said that the PS3 did, but only because MS and the fan base were so busy cheering for the 360 they ignored the general, worldwide market for the PC/FPS crowd which was mainly in the US. Never built up, if anything tore down, 1st party studios while fostering bad relations or policies with 2nd and indies.

Maybe the point of no return could apply to the Scorpio because for all the hyperbole around it, its still has the XB1's aura around it. And in order to bring back the Xbox brand from PoNR, it needs more than that.

_-EDMIX-_2576d ago

"If MS really wants to get themselves out of this slump they will"

Yea....thats the thing.

If they ever wanted to compete against Sony's large number of teams and exclusives, they would have actually started making those moves last gen.

Horizon Zero Dawn started development in 2011.

Sony bought Guerrilla Games in 2006.

Sony's been planning such a onslaught for a while, they sold more last gen because of those smart buys. MS turned down LBP (so did Nintendo) Sony invested in the IP and team and it went on to sell MILLIONS.

What has MS been doing this whole time?

They can, we know they can.....well......why haven't they?

Again...2011 Horizon Zero Dawn started development, this isn't checkers....this is chess.

Right now, you and most are waiting for MS to do something TODAY that will net them some great IPs IN HOUSE in maybe 5 years. We are still waiting for them to even start ,so if we don't see them buying lots of teams to make AAA titles that can compare to the quality and volume that Sony is bringing, I'd suggest they just are not doing it and just don't want to spend that type of money.

Its not rocket Science how to beat Sony, it just cost money MS doesn't want to spend.

rainslacker2575d ago

While that's true, the past 6 months hasn't exactly shown MS wanting to get out of their funk. Most of their time is spent on talking about Scorpio, and the only games they're talking about they've been talking about for years. Top that with cancelled games and some studio closures and it calls into question just what MS is doing to actually drive interest in their products?

I hate to say it, but it seems like right now they're just trying to stay in the discussion with what they already have, instead of actually driving excitement by always showing off new things. People criticize Sony for announcing too early, but when you put it into perspective, no matter what you may be interested in, Sony has talked about something that is coming. There's stuff to really be excited for, even if it's not right away. Even if you're not into what they have announced, the feeling that they have something else held back is strong. MS just doesn't have that at all, because it's easy to predict what they have from their first party, which means all that one can be excited for is some unknown 2nd party game that may or may not exist.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 2575d ago
2576d ago
_-EDMIX-_2576d ago

lol, they thought they would make up the money from all their DRM junk.

Their plan messed up so.......theres that lol

Tumaras2576d ago

They've screwed up virtually every aspect of Xbox in the last 4 years, hw performance, failing to deliver on cloud as promised, failing to deliver on AR/VR, the XBLA/indie market they formed and dominated over Sony during the 360 years has been ignored to the point of irrelevance, and the Xbox exclusive IPs have been a disaster.

Backwards compatibility is probably the only exception, and even the positive impact of that was massively overrated. Working 360s with guarantees from shops including all accessories sell for under $30. And that gives you 100% compatibility instead of a partial list, plus saves wear and tear on your XB1. So I've never quite understood the hype about bc when it's basically saving you $30 to play old games, and even then only if you don't have a 360 sitting around.

G20WLY2576d ago

Regarding Bc hype, I don't get it either. Xbox diehards will tell you that there's not a lack of new games on Xbox One. And yet every article trotting out another 2 old last gen games gets 400 degrees and fanboys whooping in the comments?! Lol

UltraNova2576d ago

G20WLY

Its the only thing they have left..its understandable really...

2576d ago
Trekster_Gamer2576d ago

Ultratroll,
Spoken like a truly blind ignorant fanboy.

AmUnRa2576d ago

Says the blind ignorant Xbox One fanboy😜

Nu2576d ago

The Beast Sony is coming

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2575d ago
freshslicepizza2577d ago

it was a little ahead of its time and was very poorly explained. there was some good benefits that was about to come like game sharing and the ability to sell your digital games. the once every 24 hour check in was badly planned.

ApocalypseShadow2577d ago (Edited 2577d ago )

It wasn't just poorly explained.It was bad policy and ideas for increased profits that Microsoft thought console gamers would gladly bend over and accept. Which is why I'm always at odds with them.

Gamers could already share digital games on PS3 with up to 5 systems until it was reduced to 2. That could have been friends or family.(It was a loophole Sony allowed for awhile anyway until it was abused) and trade and borrow your games with companies or friends. Microsoft saw an opportunity to try and get over just like paying for online and console features like Netflix with pay walls. They hit their limit when gamers pushed back.

No other used product gives money back to the creators. Sell a car, house, TV, clothes, etc, the manufacture doesn't make a dime on that used sale. But Microsoft thought they could control what you did with your purchase and where. And tried to get companies like EA to go along with it. Which is why EA was there from the beginning of Xbox one launch. When the policies failed, Microsoft hit the "switch" and EA turned to EA Access to profit off of old games instead.

They got greedy and was looking for more revenue streams to increase their greed. Tell the truth, who do you think you were going to sell a used digital game to? The developer isn't going to buy back a digital file decreasing their profits. No smart business would.

And if they did, the money would be next to nothing. Only good for a discount on a new game. So, why not instead just offer discounts on new games and forgo digital sales? And even if another gamer buys a digital file at reduced cost, it can be corrupted or lost over time with a HDD fail. Or, delisted as we have seen games removed from PSN and the XB store to download.

The only ones benefiting from such an idea would have been Microsoft and those that joined them. Those other ideas of 24 hour check ins and Kinect watching you for advertising dollars were just as ridiculous.

freshslicepizza2577d ago

"Which is why I'm always at odds with them."

first off you need to grow up and move on. if their current product doesn't interest you that's fine, but to hold onto this baggage shows just how personal you take things. the xbox one is eactly like the ps4 in how they handle games. look at nintendo, now they are passing the costs of cartidges again onto the consumer like the n64 days, that is impacting consumers right now. those things that microsoft talked about backfired so let it go. microsoft goofed at explaining what it was that benefitted consumers, so they scrambled and came up with a few things like game sharing (which Sony never promoted in that way, so enough of the Sony does things better all the time garbage) and authorized dealers would allow trade ins. tell me, when you buy a digital game on any console or pc what do you do with it after you finish playing it? and not all games today come in physical form either. the consumer weighed the benefits and nobody could really see what microsoft was trying to do that waa good for consumers. so they felt the backlash and moved on, yet oddly enough people like you who have taken such a position to promote sony to an almost shill like stature seem to have a grudge with microsoft. imagine that!

"EA turned to EA Access to profit off of old games instead."

which is an optional service. so how can you suggest this is negative while you pay for playstation plus and try and salvage it by suggesting you get 'free' games with it? same with xbox live gold, both are disguised to offer value when all they are is a way to leverage online play behind a paywall. and don't tell me microsoft forced their hand. did microsoft force sony into coming out with a $600 ps3? did microsoft force sony to promote playstation now as a means to get back catalog games? funny how you neglect to mention what did happen, play anywhere is now here. buy a game on windows and play it on your console or pc, that is what progressed out of it.

"They got greedy and was looking for more revenue streams to increase their greed. But Microsoft thought they could control what you did with your purchase and where. "

who isn't? they would all love for used games to not be a common theme. are you going to blame microsoft for this too,

http://www.playstationlifes...

naughty dog,
"We’re giving out a huge amount of content, and part of the reason for the online pass is that when that stuff goes online, it isn’t free. We have to pay for servers and all this different stuff to maintain it, and so at some point games have to make money. It’s a business, and we just want to be able to continue to provide that kind of content."

maybe one day when you run a business you will try and run it as a charity and see how long it lasts.

Why o why2576d ago

Moldy, you need to slow it. You use the term baggage like the past is a non factor into how people should perceive company's in their current states.

Last gen. . Microsoft dropped their levels so much it should their was a problem with growing their own. How is that not relevant now when the same pattern is emerging. I understand your back is up because of the sometimes unfair criticism of Microsoft but c'mon mate. You don't have to be on defence all of the time.

Chevalier2576d ago

@Moldy

" first off you need to grow up and move on. if their current product doesn't interest you that's fine, but to hold onto this baggage shows just how personal you take things"

You should take your own advice. Your always on here saying negative stuff about PS4 and talking up garbage Xbox products like Sony ran over your dog or something. Seriously go reread your comments, you come off as a salty fanboy.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2575d ago
Orpheo2577d ago

I agree & disagree with you that MS was ahead of its time, simultaneously.

I agree that digital distribution is the wave of the future and MS saw that. It's more convenient and efficient to the consumer, and probably more financially rewarding for the publisher since there's no used game sales.

I disagree that consumers would ever have embraced that model. If MS had waited 2 - 3 more generations that I think the public could've been dragged kicking and screaming along (assuming Sony and maybe Nintendo did likewise). But when given a choice, no consumer would willingly accept such DRM rubbish policies.

The funny part of the debacle is that MS just tried exercising completely legal and legitimate DRM laws for their device. This just goes to reinforce that consumers, and perhaps the populace in general, are fine with the government implementing ridiculous laws; what people have a problem with is their enforcement. Originally the X-Box One tried to enforce laws that had been in place for years and the consumer rightfully fought back.

freshslicepizza2577d ago (Edited 2577d ago )

there is an obvious diconnect between pc gamers and console gamers. we are all online all the time anyways, the impact is minimal unless the servers go down but who has no access for over 24 hours? so that wasn't really the problem, it was the idea. just like many panicked about the idea kinect spies on us or windows 10 is giving too much of my personal rights away because it tracks my habits. you have a bunch of people who roam the internet with their 'concerns' when at the end of the day the average user is never impacted by this tracking method or drm. they all have some form of drm regardless, it's just that microsoft put it out there too much and too fast with the check in policy. nobody really likes to hear they are being monitored even if it doesn't really impact them.

the messaging failed and microsoft paid for it but it was an uphill batlle from there. the ps4 is more powerful and priced at $100 cheaper at the time while they still try and promote kinect as something we all wanted. ever since the unveil they have tried to get back into a rythm and price cuts helped but it wasn't really until the xbox one s and its remodel that started to show a different direction, which also was timed with windows now being a major part of that plan.

they need to invest more into their own games, that is really their biggest problem right now.

2576d ago
andrewsquall2576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

@moldybread Actually a week or 2 right before the 180, they changed it again where now it would be up to each individual publisher if you are allowed to resell your games, I bet you didn't even know that. Publishers at the time were asked to comment on it and most were baffled with some of this blame now been thrown at them all of a sudden. http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... (LOOK at the updates on this article and how many times they changed how it was going to work, it was a complete mess, anyone can see that).

There is your proof as you probably don't even know how things actually went down 4 years ago, you only remember "it was ahead of its time" or "it was going to be so perfect having a console region locked to the country" lol.

Edit: When you add into this how weak the console turned out compared to its main competitor, its absolutely hilarious how anybody thinks this was a good idea in hindsight.
Oh, does it help if I mention how Xbone ended up delaying game streaming at launch, no games with Gold on Xbone, no massive F2P games yet (unless its a game they could control themselves like Killer Instinct), no game trials, no MMO support, all these things were delayed and launched slowly throughout most of 2014. How was this console ready for its digital future again when its main competitor still kicked its ass in every single one of these aspects (and PS3 already had full retail games on digital on their day of launch since 2011 too 360 would always delay a game on Xbox Live until the main buyers simmered down then slowly launch it on Xbox Live 4 months later).

Again, keep talking about that incredibly advanced Xbone you could have had, would cloud power that pushes a game like Recore to a standard native 1080p resolution really have been THAT worth it?

freshslicepizza2576d ago

Who knows how it would have worked in the end but as of now no console or PC store allows any credit from digital purchases. They were trying to come up with something, so yes it indeed was ahead of its time because nobody has come up with a solution of how to deal with digital resells.

BigWan782576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

speak for yourself @Apocalypse Shadow...

microsoft/xbox was ahead of the game 3-4yrs ago..
some tweaks needed to be made, not an overhaul in policy...
looks like slow feeding is the best approach for those that dont like sudden change

and the insider program for those that get it, and want it all, and get to test it all and then give feedback on it.

xbox original family share was WAY ahead and WAY more secure than what you are speakin of on playstation.
all you had to do on the xbox was literally tag a family members gamertag and start sharing..

oakshin2576d ago

Millions of gamers don't use the Internet at all me being one of them half the time the biggest xbox fanboy I know doesn't have Internet step outside ur millennial box most people don't have Internet and guess what they don't care either

freshslicepizza2576d ago

I'm glad you got your second cousin to go to the local library to send us this message

spicelicka2576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

Game sharing? Selling your digital games? You mean those things that we've been able to do with physical games for decades?

I don't see what benefit would've come from restricting players to digital ONLY. As an option it's perfectly fine, but it doesn't make sense to shove that policy down the throats of players who wants physical games.

Prime example of why I'm against that:

https://www.microsoft.com/e...

Witcher 3 is $55 if was to buy it digitally now, 2 years after release, when I can grab a physical copy for $20. It would have been a nightmare IMO. MS would be the sole distributor and they would set the prices how they feel.

Eonjay2576d ago

The answer to this one is really simple. All they had to do was give users both options. If you bought digitally, you would get way more benefits. Put both options in the hands of consumers and let them steer the market. Consumers would then see that digital was better and would automatically make the switch over. But simply removing an option doesn't work.

dkp232576d ago

It limited people from even selling their disc based games. There is nothing good about that.

rainslacker2575d ago

Outside the always on(which later became once every 24 hours), you seem to completely leave out the fact that the problem wasn't with their actual digital distribution policies, it was that they were going to apply those policies to retail copies.

That is what everyone was mostly pissed about, because there was no practical reason for it, and the only thing beneficial from it was the family share plan, which wasn't known about until right before they reversed the policies, and seemed to be the last ditch effort to justify keeping around what they wanted to do. Even that was questionable if they could actually make that happen given Sony couldn't even get publishers to agree to allowing 5 people to do it on the PS3 on a system which didn't actually actively promote it.

The digital distribution stuff was indeed ahead of it's time. It's a shame that they didn't keep most of that stuff to actually entice people naturally over to digital distribution by removing the downside that keep many people from actually using those services.

but the physical policies were ass backwards, and MS had no reason to have them at all. It wasn't poorly explained, it wasn't explained at all. It was just, "this is the way it is" and they expected people to just accept it. Hell, even MS didn't seem to know how it was gong to work, as every exec gave a different answer when the press asked about it. It wasn't poor explanation, it was just a convoluted mess, and realistically, just seemed like MS trying to control a market they had no right to control. They could have essentially just removed all access to play that game on another system...like nintendo digital....and just force people to use it, and it would have had the same effect....because MS was basically saying, "pay us something, and we'll let you resell your game". Explanation or not, we understood what it was.

As far as the 24 hour check in, if poorly explained is "We have a system for those people, it's called the 360" then OK...whatever you say.

freshslicepizza2575d ago

pretty much but now out of all that we have play anywhere with windows titles. so there's that. the bottom line is there is no real answer to digital libraries. even apple owners have tried to sue over who own the content if someone dies. then we have nintendo who still doesn't have much clue to how your account is supposed to work. the wii u was a nightmare on how to carry over your games in case you get new hardware.

even now when you buy a game through the psn store or xbox store or steam, what can you do with the content after you play it? we also know developers dont really like the used market either as they get no compensation. i gave an example of naughty dog and how they treated the online pass, microsoft took it one step further and paid the price.

rainslacker2574d ago

I have to agree, there is no easy answer. Obviously, every company will have it's own ideas on what it should entail, and they will also have to be accountable to those who provide content on their services, which gives publishers some leeway to make demands of the service providers.

These kinds of things are a long game though, and even when a good answer is found, it's likely to still require improvements until it's acceptable to everyone.

I think it's one of those things where the downsides of digital are becoming more apparent as more people are using it, and social media allows for a faster exchange of information, so more people are making a fuss when something they don't like comes up.

I think MS was on the right track with their actual digital policies early on though, and its' a shame those policies got delayed, because it was a step in the right direction that was sorely needed. But as I said, MS tried to keep these kinds of things in the physical realm, and that's where most people were upset. Hopefully things like Play Anywhere, and whatever other policies they bring out move them back in the right direction, because if any company actually can influence the course of digital distribution, it will be MS.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2574d ago
Cyb3r2577d ago

I thought it was Don Mattrick's decision to block used games from working on Xbox One originally

2pacalypsenow2577d ago

Nope it was all MS, Don Mattrick was just the voice, everything has to be approved by MS first. Which is why I laugh when people blame Mattrick for the Xbox reveal. If it wasn't for him, Xbox might not even be a thing anymore.

slate912576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

2pac clearly doesnt know how corporations work, and its kind of cute in a paranoia-trump-era type way.
Don is hired and paid to make these types of decisions and lead a division. His job is to make the company money. They give him the freedom to do that. And if he fails at doing that, his 2013 reveal, he will be fired and replaced by someone with a new vision that will try a different direction.
If by any chance they took 2pac's movie plot line plan, it would make no sense. Why would I pay someone hundreds of thousands/millions over time to just tell them what to do? Why would I just not do it myself?
Anyways, conspiracies have no place in constructive conversation. You need to save that for the alex jones comment sections.
Corporate structure is an actual thing. And I have worked in a few...

And sure, he probably has to get the greenlight when presenting these ideas to MS, like anything ie scorpio, but they by no means give him step-by-step direction on what to do. It doesnt make sense and is conspiracy talk.

2pacalypsenow2576d ago

Lol you actually think MS doesn't have a say in anything? They just let Phil do whatever he wants? I guess you also think the Xbox dision is by gamers for gamers and not to make Ms stockholders money? It all about money for MS, Nintendo ans Sony

Phill-Spencer2576d ago (Edited 2576d ago )

Slate

To me it feels more like ms holds phil on a very short leash and leaving him with a very low budget, in relation to ms' potential power on the console market, to handle his xbox division. That's why we still didn't ms opening a relant amount of gaming studios and therefore having a low amount of ip. I strongly believe he could and would do more but they won't let him.

AizenSosuke2576d ago

Now Microsoft you should really just admit how you guys just screw up with games.

andrewsquall2576d ago

Don't forget the serial keys that were going to be locked TO THE COUNTRY. Oh and the fact that right before the main 180, they changed their mind and said that it is now up to the individual publisher if you can resell your game, it wasn't going to be a fixed guaranteed thing across every game.
You are welcome Xbox fans, you have your first region free Xbox console that could have been even worse than previous gens.

Chris122576d ago ShowReplies(2)
Show all comments (145)
50°

LEGO Fortnite: How To Get Brightcore

The Outerhaven writes: A hunting we will go... Brightcore is important for making Power Cells and other crafting materials.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
80°

10 Weirdest Video Games of All Time

Plenty of unforgettable games have completely messed up their players throughout the years, all the way back from the PS1 days to the dark recesses of the modern internet.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
90°

6 Games That Genuinely Deserve A Current-Gen Upgrade

Games such as Mad Max, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Batman: Arkham Knight desperately deserve a modern-day revisit.

thorstein20h ago

Mad Max is underrated. Such a fun game.

Cacabunga1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

RDR2 still looks astounding on PS4 Pro. i cannot imagine how it could look with a next gen upgrade.