1160°

Battlefield 1 Won’t Have Female Soldiers in Multiplayer Because Of This Outrageous Reason

vgPWN: "Female soldiers still won't be a thing in the next Battlefield installment, but the reasoning behind it is not because of historical reasons."

scottypops2859d ago

Are you fucking kidding me ? There were NO female soldiers in WW1. And we are not going to alter history in a game just because of some fucking crybabies feminists who see inequality fucking everywhere. I am not expecting any males in Americas Top Model show so don't expect any fucking female in Battlefield 1 ffs

Gaming_Cousin2859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

Why do you get so mad at this?

Adexus2859d ago

Probably because this kind of article is happening with every game these days, moaning about why isn't *insert character here* this or that, demanding change with things that don't need to be changed.

Gaming_Cousin2859d ago

@Adexus

Lol there are better things to get mad at in this world than this smh

Rachel_Alucard2859d ago

@Gaming_Cousin

Importance on things is different for each person based on the society and the person itself. This is a common strawman argument that I see thrown about day in and day out that believes that everyone regardless of economic or society standings should adhere to the same values as everyone, which is impossble. Sure kids may be starving and britain may no longer be part of the EU, but as long as it doesn't personally affect me I see no reason to place importance on it for example.

2859d ago
x_RadicalAura_x2859d ago

Because people are becoming too soft nowadays. It's pathetic.

Yi-Long2859d ago

If the game was 'realistic' most of those men would be dying of illnesses, instead of 15-year old Timmy in his bi-plane who's on a killing-streak...

I feel in games, when possible, you should be able to create your own avatar. And that includes gender. And I would have liked to have seen that option make it in.

2859d ago
senorfartcushion2859d ago

Nerd culture has sexism and racism engrained into it.

See: Ghostbusters.

We rely heavily on victimisation, many people who consider themselves nerds have once in their lives been victimised so if a medium has something they "can't relate to" as a main protagonist e.g. a woman or someone who is not a middle class white man with glasses and a pocket protector, they get annoyed.

Yi-Long2859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

@Bruce: I think seeing people with different avatars all in the game pulls you INTO the experience. It's not just the same bland-faced square-jawed soldier who just stabbed me in the back, but when I see their face on the kill-cam it might be some grizzled old dude with a beard, or a wide-eyed 16 year old pimpleface from Indonesia, or ginger Lisa, or whatever.

I feel the emotional impact is much bigger when you actually have millions of different looking people playing together.

I think from a gameplay POV you could obviously argue about hit-boxes, but perhaps that could just be 1 more aspect of the game they could improve on: smaller players are a bit faster, but weaker. Bigger players are a bit slower, but could be a bit stronger.

Anyway, I would have liked to have seen character-creation make it into this game.

Kurdishcurse2859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

Because hes anti-woman...there you got what you wanted to hear.

Psychotica2859d ago

Because this is one of the biggest problems our society faces today. People are starving, in real wars, out of work, and homeless but they don't have to be concerned with real issues like this!

Ark_2859d ago

... because he can't be on Americas Top Model.

Just kiddin'.

2859d ago
annoyedgamer2859d ago

Tell that to the writers of this juvenile rant.

cash_longfellow2859d ago

Because SJW's are ruining the gaming industry with trash like this, that's why!

BattleAxe2858d ago

I'm so angry!!! Why can I not play as a man in Tomb Raider, Horizon: Zero Dawn, Mirror's Edge or Heavenly Sword???? /s

hay2858d ago

People are defending REALISM of BATTLEFIELD GAME. Dunno if I should lol or rotfl. Coming up next: Cortana is removed from Halo, because there are no future female AIs in the present.

agame9142858d ago

Are you part of Marcy Darcy"s feminist group cause your obviously not part of No'Mam

FPS_D3TH2858d ago

Because most of the world has had it with this sjw femnistic BS

2858d ago
wsoutlaw872858d ago

I agree with cousin. Who tf cares. Why does every majority group always act like they are being persecuted when someone else speaks up. If its a crazy complaint then who cares. why get mad about it like a child.

wsoutlaw872858d ago

If you say "pc" then you are an idiot.

rocketpanda2858d ago

Oh shut up! Firstly you are on a gaming site, then you ask why someone why so angry then tell another there are other things to get angry about. Does asking fickle questions come naturally?

Yeah lets rather complain about Brexit here or world hunger.

The anger and annoyance is justified because whenever some gender or colour isn't represent in some form of entertainment people seem to lose their minds and make out shout at developers on social media .

dantesparda2858d ago

"Battlefield 1 Won’t Have Female Soldiers in Multiplayer Because Of This Outrageous Reason"

Who f-ing cares? Im a pretty liberal guy, but this is PC to the maximum. I mean come on. I think its time guys start demanding all sorts of changes in traditonally female oriented things. This is ridiculous.

JLynn9432858d ago

I swear more people would throw a hissy fit if women were in the game than not. Freaking out either way is asinine.

Nathan_Hale532858d ago (Edited 2858d ago )

Because the people that write these articles are getting mad at this, and if whiners are enough to change a large AAA game, then that is not a good thing for a few reasons.

JackBNimble2858d ago

Hahaha... You guys are funny , do people really care either way anyways , and I am curious what percentage of woman to men play this game. I bet that less then 1% Of all players are woman ... I mean girls.

I like that, "I'm so angery right now" quote from gta 5... lol

DragonKnight2858d ago

Looks like nobody wanted to take it on, so I'll bite.

"Nerd culture has sexism and racism engrained into it."

Factually incorrect. Nerd culture is the most accepting culture there is. It was designed to be a place where the social outcasts and pariahs, i.e. nerds, could go an enjoy their interests among like-minded people without fear. This is why nerd culture encompasses so much with so many different people.

"See: Ghostbusters."

See: Strawman Fallacy.

Ghostbusters was hammered because it appears to be an awful movie trying to sell itself on feminism and brand recognition. The trailers were atrocious and 99% of any criticism levied at the movie was because of how bad the trailer is and not because it stars women. Your obfuscation will not change reality.

"We rely heavily on victimisation, many people who consider themselves nerds have once in their lives been victimised so if a medium has something they "can't relate to" as a main protagonist e.g. a woman or someone who is not a middle class white man with glasses and a pocket protector, they get annoyed."

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is a classic use of an outdated stereotype being used in an argument which still does nothing to move the entire post from erroneous drivel to anything resembling fact.

+ Show (26) more repliesLast reply 2858d ago
GottaBjimmyb2858d ago (Edited 2858d ago )

Thinking about making my own article in response. Working title "I don't care because .... it's a f/#@ing video game."

Not sure how these people create these narratives of misogyny out of nothing. I personally could care less what gender, race or species the character in a game is and I highly doubt people making games are thinking "well, I would make a woman, but I hate women."

2858d ago
Kalebninja2859d ago

Actually there were female soldiers in WW1 though not many, there will be a female playable character in the campaign, and there are men on Americas Top Model lmao so you're sounding really stupid right now

scottypops2859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

Lol feminists are gonna go crazy. I haven't seen a female soldier in any battlefield.

SoulMikeY2859d ago

lol. I think admitting you knew there are men in Americas top model ultimately makes you take the L...

Articles like this are so sad. Does it really mess your day up so bad that you feel the need to attack everything else besides your own problems?

KnightsOfTerror602859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

Ok... So you need to be educated... Very few and I mean VERY few women actually fought in WW1. Russia was the only country to have battalions of female fighters, who were ineffective in combat, who were later disbanded... Women were mostly used as desk jockeys and nurses in the war. They replaced men in factors to create munitions, food rations and clothing. If they were to fight in the war they had to disguise themselves as men to do so... Let's not pretend that they were significant fighters in the trenches beside the men ok? You be lying...

Majin-vegeta2859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

Most women were medics and working factories. in the hospitals.As far as I'm aware none were on tbe front line.

Theres a whole thread on the BF1 forums.

https://forums.battlefield....

Conquerbeard2859d ago

Been on a lot of battlefields have ya, Scottypops? Try to keep that hateboner from busting through your trousers, mate.

2859d ago
Kalebninja2859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

@knightsofterror60 yet you just said that there were women in WW1 so I was not wrong I was indeed referring to the Russian fighters.

@SoulMikeY Because I watch CW like a lot of other Americans? Commercials exist.

I like how even if I'm correct I'll still get disagreed with, shows the ignorance on this site.

Gaming_Cousin2859d ago

@Kalebninja

People like to agree + disagree on their opinion on things and ignore facts

KnightsOfTerror602858d ago

You're right but you make it sound like there were women fighting the War start to finish. While there might have been some who managed to do that, Russia's women battalions were disbanded less than a year into being created... In the last year of the war no less (1917). They were supposed be a propaganda tool to use for more men to fight. "You're a young male who didn't want to enlist in the army? Well the women did so you must be weaker than a woman." 5000 women were in these battalions and only about 1000 actually seen combat. Ultimately, it didn't work. They weren't as effective in combat (not to say they were terrible in combat but at the time Russia didn't have the resources to help make them successful) and they weren't effective in the their use of propaganda. At the end of the day, women were not as prominent in combat as some may think or want people to think. It was in 1909 that the Suffragette Movement had taken place and it wasn't until AFTER the war (1918) that they started receiving more rights for the amount they put into war efforts...

In conclusion, I'm not bashing the feminist cause for equality. I understand why they'd want to have more shown about the impact that women had on the War. They were an integral part in the war efforts but this is not a documentary or hyper-realistic movie. It's a video game. They don't all have to be historically accurate and be educational. It just seems like the Feminist movement needs to pick and choose appropriate battles that make logistical sense and in this case, it does not.

Khaotic2858d ago

The fact you know that about top model makes your opinion invalid

BLAKHOODe2858d ago

I applaud him for not watching America's Top Model.

Nathan_Hale532858d ago (Edited 2858d ago )

No, they were not combat soldiers, and many were simply nurses/medics. It was such a minute number that it is almost laughable to take into account.

Conquerbeard2857d ago

@Bruce - aww, another angry bro. Not my fault he phrased it as such. Oh well - guess we need that all-important accuracy. I guess if there were women involved, the immersion would just be RUINED! Ya'll sound like a buncha babies, for real.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 2857d ago
hazelamy2859d ago

http://ww1centenary.oucs.ox...

i suggest you educate yourself before making a fool of yourself again.

for example, the russians had 15 women only battalions.

http://historybuff.com/wwi-...

those women could have kicked your pasty little arse boy

2859d ago
hazelamy2859d ago

if you want accuracy, then you should have one life and if you die you can never play again.

and you know why there were so few women soldiers?
apart from russia, where the men didn't want to fight.

not because they were incapable, but because insecure men and their sexist attitudes that women can't be soldiers.

it's a shame idiots still hold that outdated belief a fucking century later

2859d ago
Sunny_D2859d ago

This SJW shit in the media and everything has been going on way too long. There are some issues that can be talked about, but when it reaches to the point of talking VIDEOGAME characters, then it's too much.

Chexs19902859d ago

Precisely, i just want this Shit to end already. It's corroding the entertainment Industry and all because of this PC/SJW bullshit -_-

senorfartcushion2859d ago

Ahhh nerd culture shows its sexist underbelly once again. Lack of sex? Hopefully, because if these people are having enough sex, they're just being horrible for the sake of being horrible.

ToonarmY2859d ago

Well said this political correctness we have created is total load of bollox

skiix2859d ago

There where plenty of female soldiers in WW1, just not on the US side. The US still believed in the barefoot and pregnant theme, so women where enlisted to replace the men in the civilian world; in the US. The other countries however had plenty of women in combat. As to no women in a Battlefield game. Anyone who played the campaign of BF4 knows that a woman was one of the main characters BUT not in multiplayer. Which was a mis-step imho by EA. Multiplayer is fictitious. Just because you are on a historical battlefield does not mean you are trying to have a reenactment. MP doesn't have to be historically accurate. They could have someone in a Power Ranger outfit in MP and it wouldn't effect game play.

2859d ago
Lamboomington2859d ago

Like bruce755 said, fictitious to a point. That's their decision to make. If they decide to draw the line there (which, coincidentally, the fanbase would also agree with), why are people deriding them for it ?

Nathan_Hale532858d ago

No, there were not 'plenty' of female soldiers.

iiorestesii2859d ago

The reason isn't because it wouldn't be historically accurate. The reason is because the core audience wouldn't recognize it as historically accurate. Even though there is no actual difference in the two statements, we wouldn't waste an opportunity to offend fictitious persons, because our core audience wouldn't want us to.

Aenea2859d ago (Edited 2858d ago )

Okay cool, you want a realistic BF1 huh? So even though there were a handful of female soldiers you feel it would not be realistic enough to include them in a game like this, even though many of the weapons and vehicles that are available in this game weren't common either?

I don't see why you would get so upset about this. Let me get this clear, I'm a woman, I don't really care all that much if there are female characters or not in a game but I do like it when I can choose. As for this game not including them because some people would think it's not authentic in a game that's largely already inauthentic to begin with is hogwash...

I didn't expect female soldiers in BF1 to be honest, but if they wanted to add them and they didn't because of this crazy reason that is just, well, silly.

@DragonKnight
Please don't mix up feminazis with feminists..

Adrian_v012859d ago

No one really ever expected female characters in Battlefield. But the people commenting here.. for God's sake.

"Devs can do what they want" is a totally legit reason for me, whoever comes with that argument is right. However, when you start making up excuses, like being authentic in a game that's not authentic to begin with, simply as an excuse to support your agenda, that's just really stupid and immature.

iceman062859d ago

THIS I can agree with. All of this BS about historical accuracy and immersion is silly in a MP game where you get unlimited respawns. I understand the backlash from the PC cultural push. But, often, that backlash is just as irrational as the PC push itself. Why no middle ground?
It wouldn't bother me one way or another if I saw a female avatar running around my screen (or had the choice to be one) because there's no story being told in MP. In fact, I'd welcome a story portion just to educate the uneducated. But, then, the devs would be stuck trying to explain why they focused on that aspect of the war. In the end, let the devs do what they want and judge the game when it's out. If they tried to put women in JUST for the sake of inclusion (which is a disservice, imo), then call them out. If not, and it works, applaud the effort and play on. No harm, no foul.

Ravenor2858d ago

People talking about historical accuracy in a battlefield game...it's HILARIOUS. This isn't Verdun or Red Orchestra here guys, why does anyone have a semi automatic or fully automatic weapon? 99% of the soldiers should be using bolt action rifles, why are the tanks breaking down walls? They could barely move let alone smash a brick wall. Why are all the planes doing barrel rolls and flips? That's a good way to tear your wings clean off. Why is there very little actual trench warfare in any of the trailers?

You can pick apart loads of historical inaccuracies, the inclusion of female soldiers would rate very low on my scale of accuracy. You want to be upset with SJW's and PC people for their overbearing and sometimes condescending attitudes? I'm with you there, but to act in the manner some of you act... You're doing yourself zero favours, you'll make it harder for yourself not easier.

DragonKnight2858d ago

Let's be real here. Women are not included in games like these precisely because of feminism. When you can see a poster for a f***ing movie in which a fictional, completely impossible super villain like Apocalypse is choking a fictional, completely impossible "hero" like Mystique (since when is she a hero?), who happens to be a female, and it stirs up the feminist hornet's nest; that's why there are no female soldiers in games like these.

The devs would be in a no win situation, so they decide which endless ranting b*tchfest they would think is the least b*tchy. You know that there would be endless "this game promotes casual violence against woment" articles, Anita Sarkeesian would make 87 videos about it, Jonathan McIntosh would flood his twitter about how the game not only promotes gun violence, but is proof about how straight white men want to murder women.

This is why the gaming industry should NEVER listen to ANY agenda, and gender representation IS an agenda. It will never be enough, devs will never be able to win, so Battlefield 1 having not female soldiers is the right thing to do.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2858d ago
senorfartcushion2859d ago

Multiplayer isn't a part of history numb nuts.

iiorestesii2859d ago

Yes it is. Its called Pong

senorfartcushion2859d ago

I liked that reply, very philosophical, or very literal or both.

McToasty2072859d ago

There weren't many automatic weapons equipped to soldiers other than the German MP18 in the finale months of the war, so realism hardly applies to Battlefield 1. That said I could give zero fucks what my character looks like in a multiplayer FPS game, far as I'm concerned their just a pair of hands.

senorfartcushion2859d ago

That is my reasoning too but i do believe nerd and video game culture has a sexist undertone (see: Dead or Alive) this, to me comes from the culture's need to be victimised before hand e.g. a man gets bullied, seeks solace in a game, girls are mean to him so he plays as a big strong man in the game "to impress himself" and resent any real people who might have been conencted to that victimisation and who don't meet the model of "big strong white man"

E.g. no women, no people of other races etc

theshredded2859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

But this is a videogame and an mp heavy one. How would added different polygons affect you? no really what's wrong with having females here? Having them cover their skin or be independent, strong and whatever in videogames I understand is stupid but here I find nothing wrong. And if it's immersion and realism you say then sorry to break it to you but this game and others are light years away from being 100% real. Let me remind you this is a videogame, I guess people expect too much from video games and expect to live their games. Grow up, think of others and things that do matter first. Stop being selfish people, there is absolutely NO reason not to include women here.

Chexs19902859d ago

But on the other hand, there is absolutely no reason to include them either. Let the developers create the games they want. If people don't like the result, they can buy another game :)

theshredded2859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

It's just that if I were a girl I'd be very pissed off. Try playing a match where players are all women that'll feel strange and unwanted. I mean just look at the female gamers in media excluding those who play video games lightly (either on mobile or Nintendo devices or just MineCraft or LOL and I don't know) they're all tomboys or fake and I've only known one female gamer that doesn't play lightly and guess what she's also a tomboy. Female gamers are mostly either tomboys or play lightly. Gee I wonder why.

valet_Smerdyakov2858d ago

if you were a girl you'd have another kind of problems, like finding a nail polish matching your purse.

Saijahn2859d ago

Someone got upset without looking up the facts of history. Women did participate in WWI and some on the Russian side of things actually saw combat.

Horseygamer2859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

Women where in WW1 work as logistic drivers and nurses but not on the front lines as soldiers

2859d ago
lilmisscherry2859d ago

There are males in America's Next Top Model Now but that's besides the point, I enjoy playing as a female character but not overly fussed if there isn't any in a game based during WW1.

RedSalmon2859d ago

"There were NO female soldiers in WW1."

That awkward moment when you show your complete ignorance of history.......

valet_Smerdyakov2858d ago

how does it feel to be a giant mangina? there were no female FRONT LINE soldiers in WW1.

JsonHenry2859d ago

I agree. This is dumb this is even a news article. I don't think these people realize the overwhelming majority of us just think that people like this author are just looking for reasons to be upset or offended about something.

2859d ago
IIFloodyII2859d ago

Lol, like they care about being historically accurate, the games MP factions don't even include the French or the Russians (both of which played a much bigger role than the US did), I don't care about there being no females in MP, but don't use a BS reason to justify it.

jmc88882859d ago

But they'll vote for a woman who has helped kill millions of people by voting and starting illegal wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria, etc, etc.

Priorities.

ShakyTown2859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

Although I agree that not all games need female characters just for the sake of equality in gaming, it doesn't change the fact that you sound like a little scared man boy douche.

KurtRussell2859d ago Show
thejigisup2858d ago (Edited 2858d ago )

There are and have been males in America's next top model...

joab7772858d ago

OMG. A company that is thinking about their core audience? No way! How evil of them. And can someone point out the difference b/w it being realistic and the people who play it thinking it is realistic.

We are not idiots. The reason we don't think it is historical, is because it isn't historical. I am 100% in favor of using female protagonist's etc. It adds so much to gameplay, but not in a WW1 game.

Let's not make so much of this. Let's, for once, enjoy the fruition of hard work on display.

S-Word2858d ago

lol @ people thinking this trash is going to be historically accurate. Might as well have female characters in it.

donthate2858d ago (Edited 2858d ago )

Dude it's not like BF1 is realistic. I mean who gets shots a few times, hide behind a cover and is unhurt? You don't respawn in real life, and the events in the game is certainly not realistic. It might try to adhere to history on some points.

It's a freaken game and there is nothing wrong with being inclusive.

Srelhow2858d ago

Dude read your history Russia had female soldiers. I'm not saying their were alot of female soldiers but they were there. So YES scottypops their was female soldiers in WW1. In fact here is a link read for yourself. If wikipedia ain't your thing than just google women in ww1.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

blakstarz2858d ago (Edited 2858d ago )

The women at that time where military nurses. So it makes sense that there where no female soldiers.

ASSASSYN2858d ago (Edited 2858d ago )

I got bad bews for you sparky. Women have officially and unofficially fought in every major modern war in history, as soldiers, spies, assassins, and even recon pilots.

Aviator Eugenie Mikhailovna Shakhovskaya; (1889–1920) was the first woman to become a military pilot when she flew reconnaissance missions for the Czar in 1914.

On March 17th 1917 Loretta Perfectus Walsh (1896 – 1925) became the first American active-duty Navy woman, and the first woman allowed to serve in any of the United States armed forces other than as a nurse, when she enlisted in the US Naval Reserve. She subsequently became the first woman Navy petty officer when she was sworn in as Chief Yeoman. By the end of the War America had sworn in 11,274 female Yeomen to the Navy on the same status as men.

In 1917, in a last-ditch effort to inspire the mass of war-weary soldiers to continue fighting in World War, the Russian Provisional Government created fifteen formations of women-only battalions. This included the 1st Russian Women’s Battalion of Death, commanded by Maria Bochkareva which were called into battle against the Germans during the Kerensky Offensive. The women performed well in combat, taking 200 prisoners and suffered few casualties.

Flora Sandes (1876–1955) enlisted as a St John Ambulance volunteer and was stationed in Serbia to assist the humanitarian crisis where she joined the Serbian Red Cross in Kragujevac. Separated from her unit during the retreat into Albania, she joined a Serbian regiment for safety. Here she took up the rifle and became the first woman to be commissioned as an officer in the Serbian army and the only British woman to officially enlist as a soldier in World War I. In 1916 she was promoted to corporal then sergeant, and was wounded by an enemy grenade during hand-to-hand combat during the Serbian advance on Bitola (Monastir). Awarded the King George Star (Serbia’s highest decoration), she was then promoted sergeant-major, and eventually reached the station of captain.

You might need to put the controller down and read a book or two.

Oh... and some guy named Keith Carlos, was Americas next top model winner. You just collected a lot of Ls champ.

2855d ago
+ Show (30) more repliesLast reply 2855d ago
Majin-vegeta2859d ago

Its not lame.They're trying to keep some authenticity to thw game.

Aenea2859d ago (Edited 2858d ago )

Then they should change the availability of the tanks and many of the weapons too!

Edit:
And yes, very few women were in WW1 as well and they decided to include them but didn't because some males fels it then lost it's authenticity even tho it already has stuff that's not authentic.

That's what I find funny!

EditL
@metallox
There were women in WW1, but like those tanks and several weapon they weren't all that common.

Deadpooled2859d ago

To include bolt action weapons? 'Hey, can you wait please while I take a minute to reload my weapon?'. Maybe if bolt action weapons were a one shot kill in the chest or head then maybe they could be implemented in game, otherwise they would be rarely used by players. Automatic weapons like the ones shown in the pre alpha were actually developed during the later part of the war, and some developments were developed further to eventually be used in world war 2.

Majin-vegeta2859d ago

What??All tanks that are in the game were used during WW1 and all weapons were also used.Sure soem were in prototype stages and maybe saw little to knoe combat but Dice decides to include them to the game.

Metallox2859d ago

Tanks made their debut on World War I. If I'm not mistaken, the models that appear on this game resemble the Mark units that were produced in 1918, which were considerably faster than the original Mark I; so we only need you to tell us the weapons that don't belong to WW1.

Gardenia2859d ago

Now waiting for the LGBT community saying BF1 doesn't have enough gays and transgenders. I'm sick of people trying to make everything go there way even if it doesn't fit it the game, or else it's "racism"

madpuppy2859d ago

Exactly!! All these groups believe in complete freedom to do and say what they want But! are the first in line to ban and censor everyone else's freedom to do the same.

iiorestesii2859d ago

Its the "whose offended?"/"THAT IS BANISH-ABLE!" dialog

Fist4achin2859d ago

It's so annoying as far as what anybody's sexual preference. I could care less and it should be altogether omitted unless it furthers the story in some way.

Servbot412859d ago

I like how "racist" is the go-to term. Don't like women? Racist! Don't like foreigners? Racist! Don't like LGBT people? Racist!

TheCommentator2858d ago

Next up for SJW's: There aren't enough females in the new Madden.

JLynn9432858d ago

Racism? It's amazing how stupid these arguments get. Hundreds of gamers circle jerking about how stupid it is to include women characters. Who cares? Apparently you all do.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2858d ago
pyroxxx2859d ago

This has 0 authenticity in the first place,.. they don't have French Army faction in online,.. Most game probably takes place in Western front,.. This is ridiculous,.. hell would be way more reasonable to exclude Americans and Italians.

Majin-vegeta2859d ago

Why would they include them?They always surrender lol all jokes aside.French is coming as DLC.Dice already stated why they wont be in the game at launch.

yarbie10002859d ago

The title of the article is more outrageous than its contents. Clicks who take the bait will be disappointed.

Spyroo2858d ago

Especially if they clicked without any adblock like Ublock Origin.

popopdc2859d ago (Edited 2859d ago )

It's more realistic because women were very rarely deployed as soldiers in WW1. Not because gamers don't associate with female characters. I'm pretty sure most female characters in any video games are played by guys anyways.

2859d ago
Show all comments (253)
70°

DICE Needs To Recapture The Magic Of Battlefield 1 In The Next Game

For DICE to succeed with its next game, it has to return to the roots of the franchise. Atmospheric map design, clear and defined class-based gameplay, attention to detail, and total chaos. Battlefield 1 feels like every rock, every glint on your sniper rifle, every falling brick from a collapsing church, has been painstakingly considered. So much care went into the design of the game, from its soundtrack to its costume department. To stand a chance alongside the behemoths of Treyarch and Infinity Ward, DICE needs to recapture what made their old games so brilliant, otherwise it’s all over.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
LordoftheCritics526d ago

"DICE Needs To Recapture The Magic Of Battlefield 3 In The Next Game"

/Fixed

...on a serious note, DICE needs to remove the Battlefield name.

isarai526d ago

Eh, bfbc2 was the peak for me, only ad dogfighting and the accommodations that come with it. Every BF after that was such an unsatisfying progression system for weapons and gear for the classes, 90% of the guns feel exactly the same when you unlock them, just felt boring in comparison. Not to mention the gimped destruction as the series progressed

Sciurus_vulgaris526d ago

I found Battlefield 1 to be overrated. The gameplay was simpler and less strategic than its predecessors. Battlefield 1 did have a woo-factor, but the gameplay got repetitive faster than Battlefield 4 in my opinion.

porkChop526d ago

If DICE needs to return to the roots of the franchise then why would they look at Battlefield 1? BF1 is overly simplified and streamlined. What DICE should focus on is Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2. Those two games were the pinnacle of the franchise.

TheEnigma313526d ago

BC2 was the best. they need to get back to that.

Show all comments (7)
150°

Battlefield 1, Hardline, BF4 Servers Are Being Taken Offline by Cheaters; EA Silent on Issue

Cheaters & hackers have been causing grief on Battlefield 1, Hardline & BF4 servers, with nonstop DDoS attacks among other things. Unfortunately, EA has remained silent about it.

-Foxtrot756d ago

Course they are silent, they are hoping people flock to 2042

gamesftw250755d ago

Maybe it was a inside job then haha.

jeromeface755d ago

wouldnt be the first time, titanfall 1+2 anyone?

PapaBop755d ago

Not even if they paid me.. EA always do this with old games with less money potential, if this was Ultimate Team, they'd address and sort it faster than stories could spread. Why invest time in their products when they will just dump it in the following years? Then again EA never could see the forest for the trees.

Inverno755d ago

I imagine after those games were given out for free a couple months back through Amazon, anything that makes people go to 2042 is a plus for them

XiNatsuDragnel756d ago

They want people to go on 2042. My theory

excaliburps755d ago

Nah. I think they can't do anything about it or they want to sink money into fixing it.

Pudge102888755d ago (Edited 755d ago )

EA owns all BF servers so yes, they can do something about it but they refuse to because they dont want ppl playing their old games instead of the new one. Its EA we’re talking about here

pr33k33755d ago

if this happened in 2042, they'd have something to say. which is weird, considering battlefield 1 has more players on steam right now.

Pudge102888755d ago

Its so obvious that EA is doing this or hired ppl to mess up the games so that we’d be forced to have just 1 Battlefield working.

FPS_D3TH755d ago

Honestly it’s probably the devs themselves. They did an update to bf4 way back that kinda made assault rifles doo doo in hopes that people would flock to BF1 cuz BF4 was too perfect

Show all comments (15)
140°

Xbox Store Weekly Game Sale Features Deep Discounts On Many X360 Games & DLCs

Daily Video Game writes: "This week’s weekly digital game sale on Xbox Store features deep discounts on many popular AAA Xbox 360 games that are backwards compatible for Xbox One and Xbox Series X/S, including Gears of War, Fable, Max Payne, Saints Row, Bully, Catherine, and lots more!"

Read Full Story >>
dailyvideogame.com
MadLad824d ago

Grabbed Panzer Dragoon, the Darkness, Conker Reloaded, Burnout Revenge, Time Splitters 2, Fight Night Champions, and Stuntman Ignition.

Essentially some of the classics that I can't get on PC, now that I have a Series S.