It is at last the time for the battle between NVIDIA and AMD for the best GPU award. While AMD’s king, the Radeon HD 6990, has been available for quite some time, it is only now that NVIDIA has decided to unveil its latest and most powerful creation: the GeForce GTX 590.
Now that both AMD and Nvidia have dual-GPU videocards on the market, quad-GPU CrossFireX and SLI setups are possible—that is, if you have the motherboard, the power supply, the money, and can actually find two dual-GPU cards.
Representing quad SLI, we have two relatively compact Nvidia GeForce GTX 590s. In the quad-CrossFireX corner are two of AMD's hulking, foot-long Radeon HD 6990s. Both pairs cost about the same—an astronomical $1,500, give or take—but which is the better option?
When Crysis 2 first appeared we were all a bit disappointed in the graphical splendour on offer. Crytek had, with the original Crysis, given us a taste of the future and brought plentiful eye-candy.
Crysis 2 though was held back significantly on PCs by its console roots. As the current raft of gaming consoles are now ageing somewhat the original engine only took advantage of the DirectX 9 featureset. Now though we have the v1.9 patch for Crysis 2 which enables DirectX 11 features and so it finally looks like a cutting edge PC Game.
Pixel Smashers writes: "Nvidia has decided to release a new revision of the GTX590 in order to solve problems with the card going up in smoke. The current GTX 590, when used with unsupported drivers (267.52), can literally start smoking."
As far as I understand, 3D Vision cannot be used with HDMI. So since they're wanting people to use it for Surround and 3D Surround they made the decision to go with only 3 DVI ports.
Without reading the article:
Similar performance, the 590 runs quieter, 6990 is slightly cooler.
I think Nvidia has the edge on this one. ;3
Actually, Radeon performs better (marginally) and Nvidia runs quieter and uses less power. "if you want the best there is available go for the AMD Radeon HD 6990." Helps to read.