Google+ Since the news that Google+ chief Vic Gundotra has abruptly left the company, the common wisdom holds that Google’s oft-derided Facebook clone will not be long for this world. But whether or not Google+ continues as a standalone product isn’t the question. Google likely never cared if Google+ “won” as a competitor to Facebook (though if it did, that would have been a nice bonus). All that mattered, in the end, was whether Plus became the connective tissue between all of Google’s formerly scattered services. And in a few short years, it’s fair to say it has.
Social networks have started to embrace algorithmic timelines (that is, where posts are sorted based on how the service thinks you will like it), instead of showing each post in chronological order.
According to several tips from Android Police readers, the Google Play Store may not require you to have a Google+ account to write reviews anymore.
Google's new incubator could help it keep talent by providing new business plans with funding, but is it enough?
yes may be it will not be wrong to say G+ has been serving its purpose fine
That's not quiet true. Google has been fighting to defeat Facebook which it see's as a threat to its social existence.
Google + won't go anywhere. They are using it for businesses to use as an internal communications center. They use it for their commercial customers as well. I cannot see it going anywhere. If anything it will be tweaked.