Exactly.

These guys are so stupid.

Those things they've been calling "black holes" are actually just matter absorbing engines on very large alien space ships. And when I say "very large" I mean so astronomically large that they seem to be staying in place because of their magnitude.

Trust me, this one is just a newer model with a more efficient engine.

Haha. Really.

If it is a neutron star then its not a Black Hole. And the new information is parallel to the Neutron Star extension NOT a Black Hole. So if it is Crystal Star what we observe will remain the same, but essentially Black Holes WONT exist.

I agree that the title is a little misleading, but it looks like it was based on the quote in the article by George Chapline.

Also, if what the article claims is true (still looking into the sources), it means that the current black hole theory is flawed - not just that we learned something new about a black hole.

"So first of all, a clarification. When i say Black Holes don’t exist at all, I do not mean that there is nothing there where known Black Holes exist. Simply that our model of Black Holes is flawed to such an extent that they simply are not what we think they are."

I can't stand when they hook you in with the title and then put on the brakes for "clarification."

Well, the article is an inanimate body of text, and can't really find proof per se...

No, but what this article does, is trying to say that the finding, made by other people than the writer himself, isn't compatible with the current black hole theory. So in some sense, black holes don't exist as we currently know them.