470°
Submitted by proudly_X 532d ago | article

PlayStation 4's price and DRM policies not made in response to Xbox One, Sony exec says

Polygon - The PlayStation 4's price and DRM policies were welcome announcements to those watching Sony's E3 press conference, but they weren't created in response to the same policies for Xbox One, Sony VP of Worldwide Studios Scott Rohde told Polygon in an interview earlier tonight. (Gaming, PS4, Sony)

Credit url: thatnaijablog.com
fatstarr  +   532d ago
it sure seemed that way.

it was like a real time internet form and user A went on the attack with facts leaving user b defenseless and left with the truth.
CraigandDayDay  +   532d ago
They were probably not planning on doing it even before the Xbox was shown off. Sony are much less anti-consumer than Microsoft.
SouthClaw  +   532d ago
Really? How is OtherOS working out right now for PS3? Oh yeah they removed it... very consumer friendly. Quick to forget the about of problems Sony caused consumer this generation. The amount of security problems with the PS3 is astonishing. People talk about Microsoft spying on you. Did you know that when you log onto your PS3 every single bit of possible information is transmitted or at least was when I was interested in the PS3 scene.

I don't know what Sony are doing these days if they have cut that off or actually decided to protect that information instead of transmitting it over the internet unsecured. Just so you know that information includes things like your full name, address, card details, dob, what games you have played, psn id, your history etc. So yes Sony really care about their customers...

I also find it funny how people who hated on Microsoft for Xbox Live Gold and love Sony for their PSN saying it was great that nobody had to pay to play online... oh what have Sony done now? Oh yeah you have to have PSN+ to play on the PS4. Why? It's because they screwed up at the start and didn't think their PSN through.

They wanted what Microsoft had but because they threw their network together very last minute that they didn't have time to implement PSN+ from the start.
girevik  +   532d ago
someone's cranky...
MoonConquistador  +   532d ago
Where did you pull that crap from South?

What next, it was Jack Tretton on the grassy knoll?

Give it a rest
KwietStorm  +   531d ago
Oh God
Sy_Wolf  +   531d ago
Obvious troll is obvious.
PsnGammer21  +   531d ago
But ps+ taking long to implement into psn has made it hundred times better and yes needing plus for online sucks but at least if you don't pay for it then you can still play free to play games and use streaming services like Netflix but you can't do that with xbl also does xbl give you 20 free games when u sign up hmm I don't think so but good fight bro :)
Shani  +   532d ago
Sony: Hey, we didn't plan it as response to Microsoft. But we didn't want to miss this opportunity.
Legion  +   532d ago
Really? "price and DRM policies not made in response to Xbox One"? Price... ok a given. They would have mentioned the price regardless. But DRM? Come on... at what point in Sony's thought process did they think... "Hey I bet the consumers want to know if we have any DRM restrictions." They directly mentioned any restrictions and their little loaning of games video in response to Ms reports already given out. No doubts about it.

Liars like they always have been. "Who...? Us? No way... we are the good guys... cough cough... did we mention we are charging for multiplayer now too?"
Serg  +   532d ago
That's not at all what they mean with this, the entire point went right over your head.

They stated this months ago already, in February, right after the PS4 reveal, that there will be no restrictions and no always-online.

They clearly mentioned all of that in their press conference in response to Microsoft, but they haven't changed their strategy because of Microsoft, and that is what they are saying.

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
KwietStorm  +   531d ago
The RESPONSE on stage was literally in reaction to Microsoft, but the idea not to implement it was not. They were never going that route. Microsoft made the decision on their own, probably to make nice with publishers complaining about used games, and it has already been corroborated by third party execs like Peter Moore in interviews.
#4.2 (Edited 531d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
ElitaStorm  +   532d ago
who cares, they did a good job telling the fans what what the ps4 did

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Drones and virtual reality headsets are a delicious combination

19m ago - TheVerge - We're going through an exciting period in the development of consumer drones. DJI has... | Hi-tech
30°

TechRadar - LG 55EC930V OLED review

20m ago - TechRadar - "This stylish Full HD OLED widescreen provides a premium viewing experience allied wi... | Video
30°

Self-driving car may need a human touch on crazy roads

26m ago - While hoping to make cars that are safer than those driven by people, Google has discovered its s... | Industry
10°

Samsung reveals new eye-tracking mouse for the disabled

26m ago - Samsung has just unveiled the EyeCan+, a next-gen version of its eye-tracking mouse. Positioned b... | Gadgets
Ad

Follow TechSpy on Twitter

Now - You can now follow TechSpy on twitter and get the hottest news of the day as well as early contest announcements. | Promoted post
10°

Social media causes grave damage and must be regulated

26m ago - Bullying unacceptable at home or in school but fine on social media, writes Chris Johns In th... | Culture