Nzherald: After making remarks critical of the U.S. government's attempts to strengthen international copyright law, the judge at the center of MegaUpload founder Kim DotCom's extradition proceedings has stepped down from the case.New Zealand Judge David Harvey called the U.S. government "the enemy" at a conference this week. He has now made the decision to remove himself from the case, according to the New Zealand Herald.
50°
I ve been raised thinking that stealing in any shape or form is illegal. So when i see that fat bastard pointing the finger at the american justice claiming they are the enemy all i have to say is this.
when you steal someone else property and selling it for profit, you should be punished for it, simple.
(a fence is basically a person who sells others stolen goods)
No problems there... he was acting like a Bishop.
@tsuru - sorry, but that's kind of the same as selling the content.
Megaupload: You take something, share it with everyone, and the original is still there.
Buy a dictionary.
Just to let u know though... technically megaupload wasnt sharing anything. They were hosting a hard drive. The people sharing are the people uploading.
Whatever your definition of stealing is.. mega upload wasnt doing any of it.
And by the way.. i am on mega uploads side, but definently not yours mamotte. Define stealing as whatever you want. As a software developer... if u download my stuff without my permission... ur stealing my money or earnings. You do not get to dictate what you can and cannot have under the guise of "i wouldnt have bought it anyway".
But this "fat bastard" did nothing wrong or illegal. If you want to take him down, take down face book.. youtube... and google for that matter. Your a hypocrite and an idiot.
Theres always one of you in these conversations.. when the rest of the world agrees megaupload is the victim here. A victim of others greed and corruption in the government.
I believe your governement got better things to do than abusing police force for copyright issues .
Even if there was indeed a crime , there is definitively a problem with the amount of brunt force and legal power behind this . It's no longer justice , it's being a corporation's lapdog and private force
and look at a case b4 you talk.
the government is actually in the wrong for this 1.
and if people like you let the world get away with ownership rules, you would have to pay for ur user name and every picture you use on the internet.
But when your in power you really dont need to listen to them. Its about whoevers got the money.
If the US govt complies (which it did), those big players will help Obama financially and through other means to shine their Election campaigns!