Mars Attacks... they're coming

Man your no fun

There were way too many inconsistencies in the video footage, things that simply wouldn't be possible if it were actually taken on the moon.

NASA F'd up badly with that video, they made so many glaring mistakes that anyone with common sense could tell it was bull.

We most likely have been to the moon more recently but the 1969 landing was faked.

@dasteru your joking right?What inconsistencies are you talking about?

@Dark_king:

1: The American flag waving and fluttering as Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin planted it. Photos of the landing also seem to show rippling in a breeze, The obvious problem here is that there’s no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and therefore no wind to cause the flag to blow.

2: On the moon there is only one strong light source: the Sun. So it’s fair to suggest that all shadows should run parallel to one another. But this was not the case during the moon landing: videos and photographs clearly show that shadows fall in different directions.

3: The total lack of stars in any of the photographic/video evidence. There are no clouds on the moon, so stars are perpetually visible and significantly brighter than what we see through the filter of Earth’s atmosphere.

4: The cameras used by astronauts during the moon landings had a multitude of cross-hairs to aid with scaling and direction. These are imprinted over the top of all photographs. Some of the images, however, clearly show the cross-hairs behind objects in the scene, implying that photographs may have been edited or doctored after being taken.

http://i2.wp.com/listverse....

5: 
The two photos from the Apollo 15 mission clearly have identical backdrops, despite being officially listed by NASA as having been taken miles apart. One photo even shows the lunar module. When all photographs were taken the module had already landed, so how can it possibly be there for one photo and disappear in another?

http://i1.wp.com/listverse....

@SephirothX21:

Most of the arguments in the link you provided are around the third or forth time NASA has changed their story, They come up with a new and equally bogus "explanation" every time they are asked. That alone should tell you something.

At this point, the true conspiracy theorists are the ones dumb enough to still believe in something so obviously bogus despite all the solid evidence. It's nearly become religious in nature. Blind faith, ignoring all evidence and logic, coming up with new excuses every time, even NASA themselfs haven't been able to come up with consistant reasons. They change their story constantly.

@Panthers, Look at the images of the flag, there is no top support pole. Another amusing and easily disproven bull story from NASA.

All the shots are taken at night, the sky is pitch black in all the shots and video footage yet still no stars.

Why bash religious people? What proof do you have that these are fairy tales? Ignorant people...

How is not having proof being ignorant? Religion has no proof to back up its claims. Its about evidence and religion has none of that either. People need to understand probability and certain mathematical concepts in order to rationalise. If you can rationalise, you can very quickly come to the conclusion that there is no sufficient evidence for a creator of the universe and therefore no reason to believe that there is a creator. Even if there is a creator or creators, it is still a massive jump to state that it / they can intervene in the ongoings of the universe. It is a bigger jump still to say that it / they can intervene in the lives of human beings and somehow care or have love for human beings. Though people should be entitled to believe in whatever fairy tale most appeals to them but just because a fairy tale might put one at comfort mentally, doesn't mean it is true.

@Dasteru
That link is to a page not authored by Nasa. Its simple science that you cannot argue with. Why would Russia not dispute the moon landing then? Explain that.

There's no reason to think that complex life exists on Mars right now, and life in the past on Mars wouldn't exactly be a "we can't handle it" situation.